Re: linux-next: Signed-off-by missing for commits in the pinctrl tree

From: Geert Uytterhoeven
Date: Mon Jul 16 2018 - 03:59:46 EST


Hi Linus,

On Mon, Jul 16, 2018 at 9:52 AM Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 16, 2018 at 12:10 AM Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > Commits
> >
> > bc319333c156 ("pinctrl: sh-pfc: r8a77965: Add HSCIF pins, groups, and functions")
> > 99500c6a4836 ("pinctrl: sh-pfc: r8a77990: Revise USB ID pin name")
> > 3d3c62d3458a ("pinctrl: sh-pfc: r8a77990: Add USB2.0 pins, groups and functions")
> > 1e0f13198edf ("pinctrl: sh-pfc: r8a77990: Add USB3.0 pins, groups and functions")
> >
> > are missing a Signed-off-by from their committer.
>
> I am looking at this and I just feel confused. Top to bottom:

> commit bc319333c156a710891942d34560b9fca0f52f5d
> Author: Takeshi Kihara <takeshi.kihara.df@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> Date: Thu Dec 14 13:04:55 2017 +0900
>
> pinctrl: sh-pfc: r8a77965: Add HSCIF pins, groups, and functions
>
> This patch adds HSCIF{0,1,2,3,4} pins, groups and functions to
> the R8A77965 SoC.
>
> Signed-off-by: Takeshi Kihara <takeshi.kihara.df@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@xxxxxxxxx>
>
> This is very confusing, it looks correct to me.
>
> As usual it must be some minor syntactic thing like a character missing or
> something, I am just soo.... what's wrong here, really?

The previous issue was a missing commit from the _author_, not committer.
As you rebased the branch, _you_ are now the committer, not me anymore.
So now your SoBs must be present, too.

As I already told you I had fixed up the author SoB, and updated the tag,
just drop the above commits, pull sh-pfc-for-v4.19-tag1 again, and be done
with it ;-)

Thanks!

Gr{oetje,eeting}s,

Geert

--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx

In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds