Re: [PATCH 3/3] tty: support CIBAUD without BOTHER

From: Alan Cox
Date: Mon Jul 16 2018 - 09:13:12 EST

Next message: Stefano Brivio: "Re: [PATCH net V2 1/1] net/smc: take sock lock in smc_ioctl()"
Previous message: Mel Gorman: "Re: [PATCH] Revert "mm: always flush VMA ranges affected by zap_page_range""
In reply to: Greg Kroah-Hartman: "Re: [PATCH 3/3] tty: support CIBAUD without BOTHER"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

> Ugh, I thought glibc got support for it, I guess everyone just
> hand-codes it in their applications for now. Sad.

The glibc people actively contributed to its design and then went radio
silent on the subject.

Alan

Next message: Stefano Brivio: "Re: [PATCH net V2 1/1] net/smc: take sock lock in smc_ioctl()"
Previous message: Mel Gorman: "Re: [PATCH] Revert "mm: always flush VMA ranges affected by zap_page_range""
In reply to: Greg Kroah-Hartman: "Re: [PATCH 3/3] tty: support CIBAUD without BOTHER"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]