Re: vfs / overlayfs conflict resolution for linux-next

[Stephen Rothwell]

Hi Al,

On Wed, 18 Jul 2018 03:56:37 +0100 Al Viro <viro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> ... and now it even builds.  Said that, I would really like to hear something
> from you - I can duplicate the entire overlayfs-next and merge it into
> my #for-next and ask Steven to use that instead of your tree, but I very
> much dislike going over your head like that.
> 
> I realize that you'd been away for a while and probably are digging yourself
> from under the piles of mail, but it's getting late in the cycle and I want
> to get #for-next into reasonably sane shape.  Please, look through that
> thing and respond.

Almost everything has been removed from the overlayfs tree in
linux-next today.  The only commit there currently is:

67810693077a ovl: fix wrong use of impure dir cache in ovl_iterate()
-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

Attachment: pgpRbp7XBFM3H.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature