Re: [PATCH V2] drm: handle error values properly
From: Nicholas Mc Guire
Date: Wed Jul 18 2018 - 01:38:38 EST
On Tue, Jul 17, 2018 at 04:14:16PM -0400, Sean Paul wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 17, 2018 at 03:28:21PM +0200, Nicholas Mc Guire wrote:
> > drm_legacy_ctxbitmap_next() returns idr_alloc() which can return
> > -ENOMEM, -EINVAL or -ENOSPC none of which are -1. since drm_context_t
> > is an unsigned int an intermediate variable is used to handle the
> > error cases, and then cast to drm_context_t after ensuring that the
> > value is >= 0. The explicit cast is to mark the type conversion as
> > intentional.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Nicholas Mc Guire <hofrat@xxxxxxxxx>
> > Reported-by: kbuild test robot <lkp@xxxxxxxxx>
> > Fixes: d530b5f1ca0b ("drm: re-enable error handling")
> > Fixes: 62968144e673 ("drm: convert drm context code to use Linux idr")
> > ---
> >
> > kbuild test robot reported:
> > <snip>
> > tree: git://anongit.freedesktop.org/drm/drm-misc for-linux-next-fixes
> > head: d530b5f1ca0bb66958a2b714bebe40a1248b9c15
> > commit: d530b5f1ca0bb66958a2b714bebe40a1248b9c15 [2/2] drm: re-enable error
> > +handling
> >
> > smatch warnings:
> > drivers/gpu/drm/drm_context.c:375 drm_legacy_addctx() warn: unsigned
> > +'ctx->handle' is never less than zero.
> > <snip>
> >
> > V2: The proposed fix in d530b5f1ca0b ("drm: re-enable error handling")
> > actually was ineffective as the negative return value check was
> > against a unsigned int and thus always false as reported by
> > kbuild test robot <lkp@xxxxxxxxx>. The below patch removes that
> > warning and fixes the original problem of missed error handling.
> >
> > drm_context_t is actually just used in a few placed so the type could be
> > changed but it is also exported via tools/include/uapi/drm/drm.h so
> > changing the typedef of drm_context_t could break applications and thus
> > this is not an option.
> >
> > Patch was compile tested with: x86_64_defconfig
> >
> > Patch is against 4.18-rc4 (localversion-next is next-20180717)
> >
> > drivers/gpu/drm/drm_context.c | 12 ++++++++----
> > 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_context.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_context.c
> > index 3c4000f..78f32a3 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_context.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_context.c
> > @@ -361,22 +361,26 @@ int drm_legacy_addctx(struct drm_device *dev, void *data,
> > {
> > struct drm_ctx_list *ctx_entry;
> > struct drm_ctx *ctx = data;
> > + int ret;
> >
> > if (!drm_core_check_feature(dev, DRIVER_KMS_LEGACY_CONTEXT) &&
> > !drm_core_check_feature(dev, DRIVER_LEGACY))
> > return -EINVAL;
> >
> > ctx->handle = drm_legacy_ctxbitmap_next(dev);
>
> Remove this call?
yup - forgot to remove that line after copying
The modified block should be:
int ret;
...
ret = drm_legacy_ctxbitmap_next(dev);
if (ret == DRM_KERNEL_CONTEXT) {
/* Skip kernel's context and get a new one. */
ret = drm_legacy_ctxbitmap_next(dev);
}
DRM_DEBUG("ctxbitmap is error code %d\n", ret);
if (ret < 0) {
DRM_DEBUG("Not enough free contexts.\n");
/* Should this return -EBUSY instead? */
return -ENOMEM;
}
/* valid context is >= 0 */
ctx->handle = (drm_context_t)ret;
thanks for cathcing that - will resend
thx!
hofrat
>
> > - if (ctx->handle == DRM_KERNEL_CONTEXT) {
> > + ret = drm_legacy_ctxbitmap_next(dev);
> > + if (ret == DRM_KERNEL_CONTEXT) {
> > /* Skip kernel's context and get a new one. */
> > - ctx->handle = drm_legacy_ctxbitmap_next(dev);
> > + ret = drm_legacy_ctxbitmap_next(dev);
> > }
> > - DRM_DEBUG("%d\n", ctx->handle);
> > - if (ctx->handle < 0) {
> > + DRM_DEBUG("ctxbitmap is error code %d\n", ret);
> > + if (ret < 0) {
> > DRM_DEBUG("Not enough free contexts.\n");
> > /* Should this return -EBUSY instead? */
> > return -ENOMEM;
> > }
> > + /* valid context is >= 0 */
> > + ctx->handle = (drm_context_t)ret;
> >
> > ctx_entry = kmalloc(sizeof(*ctx_entry), GFP_KERNEL);
> > if (!ctx_entry) {
> > --
> > 2.1.4
> >
>
> --
> Sean Paul, Software Engineer, Google / Chromium OS