Re: [PATCHv5 04/19] mm/page_alloc: Unify alloc_hugepage_vma()

[Dave Hansen]

A grammar error or two is probably OK in these descriptions, but these
are just riddled with them in a way that makes them hard to read.
Suggestions below.

On 07/17/2018 04:20 AM, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
> We don't need to have separate implementations of alloc_hugepage_vma()
> for NUMA and non-NUMA. Using variant based on alloc_pages_vma() we would
> cover both cases.

"Using the"

> This is preparation patch for allocation encrypted pages.

"a preparation"

"allocation encrypted pages" -> "allocation of encrypted pages" or
"allocation encrypted pages" -> "allocating encrypted pages" or

> alloc_pages_vma() will handle allocation of encrypted pages. With this
> change we don' t need to cover alloc_hugepage_vma() separately.

"don' t" -> "don't"

> The change makes typo in Alpha's implementation of

"a typo"