Re: [PATCH 1/6] drivers/md/raid5: Use irqsave variant of atomic_dec_and_lock()

From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
Date: Thu Jul 19 2018 - 03:35:58 EST

Next message: David Woodhouse: "Re: [RFC] Make need_resched() return true when rcu_urgent_qs requested"
Previous message: kbuild test robot: "[tip:x86/mm 3/8] mm/memory.c:339:2: error: implicit declaration of function 'tlb_flush_remove_tables_local'; did you mean 'tlb_remove_table'?"
In reply to: Shaohua Li: "Re: [PATCH 1/6] drivers/md/raid5: Use irqsave variant of atomic_dec_and_lock()"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On 2018-07-18 19:44:05 [-0700], Shaohua Li wrote:
> Since you sent a series, I suppose you want someone else to take it. But I can
> take it for sure, will do soon.

I'm sorry for the miss understanding. I tried to explain this in the
cover letter. The prerequisites are already merged so then the actual
changes can be merged via the individual maintainer.
Thank you Shaohua.

> Thanks,
> Shaohua

Sebastian

Next message: David Woodhouse: "Re: [RFC] Make need_resched() return true when rcu_urgent_qs requested"
Previous message: kbuild test robot: "[tip:x86/mm 3/8] mm/memory.c:339:2: error: implicit declaration of function 'tlb_flush_remove_tables_local'; did you mean 'tlb_remove_table'?"
In reply to: Shaohua Li: "Re: [PATCH 1/6] drivers/md/raid5: Use irqsave variant of atomic_dec_and_lock()"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]