Re: [RFC PATCH] mtd: nand: toshiba: Add support for ->exec_op()

From: Boris Brezillon
Date: Thu Jul 19 2018 - 04:24:29 EST


On Thu, 19 Jul 2018 16:53:47 +0900
KOBAYASHI Yoshitake <yoshitake.kobayashi@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> This patch is a patch to support TOSHIBA MEMORY CORPORATION BENAND
> memory devices. This use vendor specific command
> (TOSHIBA_NAND_CMD_ECC_STATUS) to know the exact bitflips. However, I
> could not test this patch because I do not have a platform that
> supports chip-> exec_op. Therefore, I post this patch as RFC.
>
> As soon as I get a platform that supports chip-> exec_op, I would like
> to test and re-post.
>
> Signed-off-by: KOBAYASHI Yoshitake <yoshitake.kobayashi@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/mtd/nand/raw/nand_toshiba.c | 76
> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------- 1 file changed, 61
> insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/nand_toshiba.c
> b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/nand_toshiba.c index 6cec923..12218cd 100644
> --- a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/nand_toshiba.c
> +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/nand_toshiba.c
> @@ -17,28 +17,74 @@
>
> #include <linux/mtd/rawnand.h>
>
> +/* ECC Status Read Command for BENAND */
> +#define TOSHIBA_NAND_CMD_ECC_STATUS_READ 0x7A
> +
> +/* ECC Status Mask for BENAND */
> +#define TOSHIBA_NAND_ECC_STATUS_MASK 0x0F
> +
> /* Recommended to rewrite for BENAND */
> #define TOSHIBA_NAND_STATUS_REWRITE_RECOMMENDED BIT(3)
>
> +static int toshiba_nand_benand_read_eccstatus_op(struct nand_chip
> *chip,
> + u8 *buf)
> +{
> + u8 *ecc_status = buf;
> +

How about letting this function return -ENOTSUPP when ->exec_op() is
not implemented?

if (!chip->exec_op)
return -ENOTSUPP;

> + const struct nand_sdr_timings *sdr =
> + nand_get_sdr_timings(&chip->data_interface);
> + struct nand_op_instr instrs[] = {
> + NAND_OP_CMD(TOSHIBA_NAND_CMD_ECC_STATUS_READ,
> + PSEC_TO_NSEC(sdr->tADL_min)),
> + NAND_OP_8BIT_DATA_IN(chip->ecc.steps, ecc_status, 0),
> + };
> + struct nand_operation op = NAND_OPERATION(instrs);
> +
> + /* Drop the DATA_IN instruction if chip->ecc.steps is set to
> 0. */
> + if (!chip->ecc.steps)

Can this really happen? I hope not.

> + op.ninstrs--;
> +
> + return nand_exec_op(chip, &op);
> +}
> +
> static int toshiba_nand_benand_eccstatus(struct mtd_info *mtd,
> struct nand_chip *chip)
> {
> - int ret;
> + int ret, i;
> unsigned int max_bitflips = 0;
> - u8 status;
> -
> - /* Check Status */
> - ret = nand_status_op(chip, &status);
> - if (ret)
> - return ret;
> -
> - if (status & NAND_STATUS_FAIL) {
> - /* uncorrected */
> - mtd->ecc_stats.failed++;
> - } else if (status & TOSHIBA_NAND_STATUS_REWRITE_RECOMMENDED)
> {
> - /* corrected */
> - max_bitflips = mtd->bitflip_threshold;
> - mtd->ecc_stats.corrected += max_bitflips;
> + u8 status, bitflips, ecc_status[8];
> +
> + if (chip->exec_op) {
> + /* Check ECC Status */
> + ret = toshiba_nand_benand_read_eccstatus_op(chip,
> ecc_status);
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < chip->ecc.steps; i++) {
> + bitflips = (ecc_status[i] &
> + TOSHIBA_NAND_ECC_STATUS_MASK);

Unneeded parens.

> + if (bitflips == 0x0F) {

Please define a macro for the UNCORRECTABLE (0xf) value.

> + mtd->ecc_stats.failed++;
> + } else {
> + mtd->ecc_stats.corrected += bitflips;
> + max_bitflips = max_t(unsigned int,
> + max_bitflips,
> bitflips);

Declare bitflips as an unsigned int, so that you can use max() instead
of max_t().

> + }
> + }
> + } else {
> + /* Check Status */
> + ret = nand_status_op(chip, &status);
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
> +
> + if (status & NAND_STATUS_FAIL) {
> + /* uncorrected */
> + mtd->ecc_stats.failed++;
> + } else if (status &
> TOSHIBA_NAND_STATUS_REWRITE_RECOMMENDED) {
> + /* corrected */
> + max_bitflips = mtd->bitflip_threshold;
> + mtd->ecc_stats.corrected += max_bitflips;
> + }
> }

If you go for the "toshiba_nand_benand_read_eccstatus_op() returns
-ENOTSUPP solution", you could replace the above section by:

ret = toshiba_nand_benand_read_eccstatus_op(chip, ecc_status);
if (!ret) {
u8 ecc_status[8];
unsigned int i;

for (i = 0; i < chip->ecc.steps; i++) {
bitflips = ecc_status[i] & TOSHIBA_NAND_ECC_STATUS_MASK;
if (bitflips == TOSHIBA_NAND_ECC_STATUS_UNCORR) {
mtd->ecc_stats.failed++;
} else {
mtd->ecc_stats.corrected += bitflips;
max_bitflips = max(max_bitflips,bitflips);
}
}

return max_bitflips;
}

/*
* Fallback to regular status check if
* toshiba_nand_benand_read_eccstatus_op() failed.
*/
ret = nand_status_op(chip, &status);
if (ret)
return ret;

if (status & NAND_STATUS_FAIL) {
/* uncorrected */
mtd->ecc_stats.failed++;
} else if (status & TOSHIBA_NAND_STATUS_REWRITE_RECOMMENDED) {
/* corrected */
max_bitflips = mtd->bitflip_threshold;
mtd->ecc_stats.corrected += max_bitflips;
}

return max_bitflips;
}