Re: [PATCH V2 0/6] mailbox: ti-msgmgr: Add support for AM654 Secure Proxy

[Nishanth Menon]

On 18:06-20180716, Nishanth Menon wrote:
> The V2 of the series updates a minor comment in binding and picks up Rob's Reviewed-by
> 
> Since I have'nt seen additional comments, I am assuming things are fine for v4.19.
> 
> The following series enables support for Secure Proxy in newest addition in TI's SoC
> portfolio - AM654 SoC (posted previously as RFC).
> 
> The series is based on v4.18-rc1 and is available here:
> https://github.com/nmenon/linux-2.6-playground/commits/upstream/v4.18-rc1/k3-1-am6-sproxy
> 
> There are a couple of follow on patches to be posted as well (Kconfig changes
> for K3_ARCH and actual dts node changes).
> 
> Changes since RFC are highlighted in each of the patches, but overall:
> * The K3 dependency has been broken out into a seperate series independent of
>   this.
> * Binding has been seperated out as it's own file (even though the driver is
>   reused).
> 
> Consolidated all patches (including all series) are available here:
> https://github.com/nmenon/linux-2.6-playground/commits/upstream/v4.18-rc1/k3-am6-integ
> 
> Full Boot log  on AM654 (integrated with all patch series) is available here:
>    https://pastebin.ubuntu.com/p/bBFmnzYtCd/
> 
> Nishanth Menon (6):
>   mailbox: ti-msgmgr: Get rid of unused structure members
>   mailbox: ti-msgmgr: Allocate Rx channel resources only on request
>   mailbox: ti-msgmgr: Change message count mask to be descriptor based
>   mailbox: ti-msgmgr: Move the memory region name to descriptor
>   dt-bindings: mailbox: Add support for secure proxy threads
>   mailbox: ti-msgmgr: Add support for Secure Proxy
> 
>  .../bindings/mailbox/ti,secure-proxy.txt           |  50 +++
>  drivers/mailbox/ti-msgmgr.c                        | 353 +++++++++++++++++----
>  2 files changed, 336 insertions(+), 67 deletions(-)
>  create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mailbox/ti,secure-proxy.txt


Jassi,

I dont see this in next-20180723. You'd asked me to hold off on pings
https://lkml.org/lkml/2017/12/16/353 -> so, held off as much as I could
before wondering on the status.

-- 
Regards,
Nishanth Menon