Re: [PATCH v3 00/35] Qualcomm Camera Subsystem driver - 8x96 support

[Hans Verkuil]

On 23/07/18 13:02, Todor Tomov wrote:
> Changelog v3:
> - split patch 08 to device tree binding patch and driver patch and
>   improve commit message.
> 
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> This patchset adds support for the Qualcomm Camera Subsystem found
> on Qualcomm MSM8996 and APQ8096 SoC to the existing driver which
> used to support MSM8916 and APQ8016.
> 
> The camera subsystem hardware on 8x96 is similar to 8x16 but
> supports more cameras and features. More details are added in the
> driver document by the last patch.
> 
> The first 3 patches are dependencies which have already been on
> the mainling list but I'm adding them here for completeness.
> 
> The following 12 patches add general updates and fixes to the driver.
> Then the rest add the support for the new hardware.
> 
> The driver is tested on Dragonboard 410c (APQ8016) and Dragonboard 820c
> (APQ8096) with OV5645 camera sensors. media-ctl [1], yavta [2] and
> GStreamer were used for testing.
> 
> [1] https://git.linuxtv.org//v4l-utils.git
> [2] http://git.ideasonboard.org/yavta.git
> 
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------

When running sparse I get these warnings:

camss/camss-csiphy-2ph-1-0.c:170:28: warning: symbol 'csiphy_ops_2ph_1_0' was not declared. Should it be static?
camss/camss-csiphy-3ph-1-0.c:250:28: warning: symbol 'csiphy_ops_3ph_1_0' was not declared. Should it be static?
camss/camss-vfe-4-1.c:976:25: warning: symbol 'vfe_ops_4_1' was not declared. Should it be static?
camss/camss-vfe-4-7.c:1098:25: warning: symbol 'vfe_ops_4_7' was not declared. Should it be static?

checkpatch.pl complains about this as well.

There are externs in vfe.c, but those should probably be moved to camss-vfe.h.

It should solves both checkpatch and sparse.

Regards,

	Hans