Re: [GIT PULL 00/27] perf/core improvements and fixes

[Ingo Molnar]

* Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Hi Ingo,
> 
> 	Please consider pulling, I'm now investigating why these failed:
> 
>   38: LLVM search and compile                               :
>   38.1: Basic BPF llvm compile                              : Ok
>   38.2: kbuild searching                                    : Ok
>   38.3: Compile source for BPF prologue generation          : Ok
>   38.4: Compile source for BPF relocation                   : FAILED!
>   40: BPF filter                                            :
>   40.1: Basic BPF filtering                                 : Ok
>   40.2: BPF pinning                                         : Ok
>   40.3: BPF prologue generation                             : Ok
>   40.4: BPF relocation checker                              : FAILED!
> 
> 	I think these failures are not related to changes in this patch
> kit. Details about the test environment, versions, etc.

Ok!

> The following changes since commit 1d59d16e9b4d5be80c9786a8b129c0f2af0e9522:
> 
>   Merge remote-tracking branch 'tip/perf/urgent' into perf/core (2018-07-24 14:34:32 -0300)
> 
> are available in the Git repository at:
> 
>   git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/acme/linux.git tags/perf-core-for-mingo-4.19-20180725

>  52 files changed, 1456 insertions(+), 109 deletions(-)

Pulled, thanks a lot Arnaldo!

Could we please also fix these before v4.18 is released, which trigger in 
perf/urgent:

Warning: Kernel ABI header at 'tools/include/uapi/linux/perf_event.h' differs from latest version at 'include/uapi/linux/perf_event.h'
Warning: Kernel ABI header at 'tools/arch/powerpc/include/uapi/asm/unistd.h' differs from latest version at 'arch/powerpc/include/uapi/asm/unistd.h'
Warning: Kernel ABI header at 'tools/arch/x86/lib/memcpy_64.S' differs from latest version at 'arch/x86/lib/memcpy_64.S'
Warning: Kernel ABI header at 'tools/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h' differs from latest version at 'include/uapi/linux/bpf.h'

?

Thanks!

	Ingo