Re: [PATCH] watchdog: sp805: Add clock-frequency property
From: Srinath Mannam
Date: Thu Jul 26 2018 - 00:47:42 EST
Hi Guenter,
It was my mistake sorry for that. I thought to add as Rivewed-by your name..
Many changes are made based on your review comments and suggestions.
So, Can I add your name in Reviewed list?
I will modify and send next patchset.
thank you.
Regards,
Srinath.
On Thu, Jul 26, 2018 at 10:12 AM, Guenter Roeck <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 07/23/2018 01:37 AM, Srinath Mannam wrote:
>>
>> Use clock-frequency property given in _DSD object
>> of ACPI device to calculate Watchdog rate as binding
>> clock devices are not available as device tree.
>>
>> Note: There is no formal review process for _DSD
>> properties
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Srinath Mannam <srinath.mannam@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> Signed-off-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
>
> I just noticed this. This is completely inappropriate. It is
> the equivalent of forging a signature on a check.
>
> _Never_ add a Signed-off-by: statement for anyone but yourself.
>
> Guenter
>
>> Reviewed-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> Reviewed-by: Ray Jui <ray.jui@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> Reviewed-by: Scott Branden <scott.branden@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>> drivers/watchdog/sp805_wdt.c | 35 +++++++++++++++++++++++++----------
>> 1 file changed, 25 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/watchdog/sp805_wdt.c b/drivers/watchdog/sp805_wdt.c
>> index 9849db0..a896b1c 100644
>> --- a/drivers/watchdog/sp805_wdt.c
>> +++ b/drivers/watchdog/sp805_wdt.c
>> @@ -11,6 +11,7 @@
>> * warranty of any kind, whether express or implied.
>> */
>> +#include <linux/acpi.h>
>> #include <linux/device.h>
>> #include <linux/resource.h>
>> #include <linux/amba/bus.h>
>> @@ -22,6 +23,7 @@
>> #include <linux/math64.h>
>> #include <linux/module.h>
>> #include <linux/moduleparam.h>
>> +#include <linux/of.h>
>> #include <linux/pm.h>
>> #include <linux/slab.h>
>> #include <linux/spinlock.h>
>> @@ -65,6 +67,7 @@ struct sp805_wdt {
>> spinlock_t lock;
>> void __iomem *base;
>> struct clk *clk;
>> + u64 rate;
>> struct amba_device *adev;
>> unsigned int load_val;
>> };
>> @@ -80,7 +83,7 @@ static int wdt_setload(struct watchdog_device *wdd,
>> unsigned int timeout)
>> struct sp805_wdt *wdt = watchdog_get_drvdata(wdd);
>> u64 load, rate;
>> - rate = clk_get_rate(wdt->clk);
>> + rate = wdt->rate;
>> /*
>> * sp805 runs counter with given value twice, after the end of
>> first
>> @@ -106,9 +109,7 @@ static int wdt_setload(struct watchdog_device *wdd,
>> unsigned int timeout)
>> static unsigned int wdt_timeleft(struct watchdog_device *wdd)
>> {
>> struct sp805_wdt *wdt = watchdog_get_drvdata(wdd);
>> - u64 load, rate;
>> -
>> - rate = clk_get_rate(wdt->clk);
>> + u64 load;
>> spin_lock(&wdt->lock);
>> load = readl_relaxed(wdt->base + WDTVALUE);
>> @@ -118,7 +119,7 @@ static unsigned int wdt_timeleft(struct
>> watchdog_device *wdd)
>> load += wdt->load_val + 1;
>> spin_unlock(&wdt->lock);
>> - return div_u64(load, rate);
>> + return div_u64(load, wdt->rate);
>> }
>> static int
>> @@ -228,11 +229,25 @@ sp805_wdt_probe(struct amba_device *adev, const
>> struct amba_id *id)
>> if (IS_ERR(wdt->base))
>> return PTR_ERR(wdt->base);
>> - wdt->clk = devm_clk_get(&adev->dev, NULL);
>> - if (IS_ERR(wdt->clk)) {
>> - dev_warn(&adev->dev, "Clock not found\n");
>> - ret = PTR_ERR(wdt->clk);
>> - goto err;
>> + if (adev->dev.of_node) {
>> + wdt->clk = devm_clk_get(&adev->dev, NULL);
>> + if (IS_ERR(wdt->clk)) {
>> + dev_err(&adev->dev, "Clock not found\n");
>> + return PTR_ERR(wdt->clk);
>> + }
>> + wdt->rate = clk_get_rate(wdt->clk);
>> + } else if (has_acpi_companion(&adev->dev)) {
>> + /*
>> + * When Driver probe with ACPI device, clock devices
>> + * are not available, so watchdog rate get from
>> + * clock-frequency property given in _DSD object.
>> + */
>> + device_property_read_u64(&adev->dev, "clock-frequency",
>> + &wdt->rate);
>> + if (!wdt->rate) {
>> + dev_err(&adev->dev, "no clock-frequency
>> property\n");
>> + return -ENODEV;
>> + }
>> }
>> wdt->adev = adev;
>>
>