Re: [PATCH] drivers/memory/Kconfig: Add CONFIG_OF dependency

[Miquel Raynal]

Hi Boris,

Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote on Mon, 23 Jul 2018
11:41:07 +0200:

> On Mon, 23 Jul 2018 11:34:43 +0200
> Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> > On Sun, Jul 22, 2018 at 8:29 AM, Boris Brezillon
> > <boris.brezillon@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:  
> > > +Arnd, Rob and the DT ML.
> > >
> > > On Sat, 21 Jul 2018 14:53:47 -0700
> > > Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > >    
> > >> On 07/21/2018 01:00 PM, Anders Roxell wrote:    
> > >> > JZ4780_NEMC doesn't depend on OF, and if OF isn't enabled we get this
> > >> > error:
> > >> > drivers/memory/jz4780-nemc.c: In function âjz4780_nemc_num_banksâ:
> > >> > drivers/memory/jz4780-nemc.c:72:10: error: implicit declaration of
> > >> >  function âof_read_numberâ; did you mean âdown_read_nestedâ?
> > >> >  [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
> > >> >    bank = of_read_number(prop, 1);
> > >> >           ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> > >> >           down_read_nested    
> > >
> > > Looks like of.h defines stubs so that people can compile-test without
> > > CONFIG_OF selected. Maybe we should move of_read_number() and
> > > of_read_ulong() out of the #ifdef CONFIG_OF section.    
> > 
> > That seems fine, though the added dependency seems appropriate
> > here as well. of_read_number() is rarely used, and for the most part in
> > powerpc specific code that is guaranteed to have CONFIG_OF enabled,
> > so it's not that likely to cause many more problems.  
> 
> Ok, then I'll let Miquel apply Anders' patch to the NAND tree.

Applied to nand/next, thanks.

MiquÃl