Re: [PATCH] f2fs: avoid race between zero_range and background GC

From: Jaegeuk Kim
Date: Sat Jul 28 2018 - 22:06:23 EST


On 07/27, Chao Yu wrote:
> On 2018/7/27 18:29, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
> > On 07/26, Chao Yu wrote:
> >> Thread A Background GC
> >> - f2fs_zero_range
> >> - truncate_pagecache_range
> >> - gc_data_segment
> >> - get_read_data_page
> >> - move_data_page
> >> - set_page_dirty
> >> - set_cold_data
> >> - f2fs_do_zero_range
> >> - dn->data_blkaddr = NEW_ADDR;
> >> - f2fs_set_data_blkaddr
> >>
> >> Actually, we don't need to set dirty & checked flag on the page, since
> >> all valid data in the page should be zeroed by zero_range().
> >
> > But, it doesn't matter too much, right?
>
> No, if the dirtied page is writebacked after f2fs_do_zero_range(), result of
> zero_range() should be wrong, as zeroed page contains valid user data.

How about truncating page caches after block address change or doing it twice
before and after?

>
> >
> >> Use i_gc_rwsem[WRITE] to avoid such race condition.
> >
> > Hope to avoid abusing i_gc_rwsem[] tho.
>
> Agreed, let's try avoiding until we have to use it.
>
> Thanks,
>
> >
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Chao Yu <yuchao0@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >> ---
> >> fs/f2fs/file.c | 2 ++
> >> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/file.c b/fs/f2fs/file.c
> >> index 267ec3794e1e..7bd2412a8c37 100644
> >> --- a/fs/f2fs/file.c
> >> +++ b/fs/f2fs/file.c
> >> @@ -1309,6 +1309,7 @@ static int f2fs_zero_range(struct inode *inode, loff_t offset, loff_t len,
> >> if (ret)
> >> return ret;
> >>
> >> + down_write(&F2FS_I(inode)->i_gc_rwsem[WRITE]);
> >> down_write(&F2FS_I(inode)->i_mmap_sem);
> >> ret = filemap_write_and_wait_range(mapping, offset, offset + len - 1);
> >> if (ret)
> >> @@ -1389,6 +1390,7 @@ static int f2fs_zero_range(struct inode *inode, loff_t offset, loff_t len,
> >> }
> >> out_sem:
> >> up_write(&F2FS_I(inode)->i_mmap_sem);
> >> + up_write(&F2FS_I(inode)->i_gc_rwsem[WRITE]);
> >>
> >> return ret;
> >> }
> >> --
> >> 2.18.0.rc1