Re: [PATCH v2 0/6] Add support for MSCC Ocelot i2c
From: Andy Shevchenko
Date: Tue Jul 31 2018 - 10:18:16 EST
On Tue, 2018-07-31 at 15:47 +0200, Alexandre Belloni wrote:
> Because the designware IP was not able to handle the SDA hold time
> version 1.11a, MSCC has its own implementation. Add support for it and
> then add
> i2c on ocelot boards.
> I would expect patches 1 to 4 to go through the i2c tree and 5-6
> the mips tree once patch 4 has been reviewed by the DT maintainers.
Thanks for an update, looks quite nice!
I gave my tags wherever it is appropriate.
> Changes in v2:
> - removed first patch as a similar one is in i2c-next
> - rebase on top of i2c-next
It seems you also took my patches which are not yet in i2c/for-next.
> - Added two patches to implement ideas from Andy
> Alexandre Belloni (6):
> i2c: designware: use generic table matching
> i2c: designware: move #ifdef CONFIG_OF to the top
> i2c: designware: allow IP specific sda_hold_time
> i2c: designware: add MSCC Ocelot support
> mips: dts: mscc: Add i2c on ocelot
> mips: dts: mscc: enable i2c on ocelot_pcb123
> .../bindings/i2c/i2c-designware.txt | 9 ++-
> arch/mips/boot/dts/mscc/ocelot.dtsi | 18 ++++++
> arch/mips/boot/dts/mscc/ocelot_pcb123.dts | 6 ++
> drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-designware-common.c | 2 +
> drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-designware-core.h | 4 ++
> drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-designware-platdrv.c | 62 +++++++++++++++---
> 6 files changed, 87 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Intel Finland Oy