[PATCH 4.9 037/144] perf/x86/intel/uncore: Correct fixed counter index check in generic code

[Greg Kroah-Hartman]

4.9-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Kan Liang <kan.liang@xxxxxxxxx>

[ Upstream commit 4749f8196452eeb73cf2086a6a9705bae479d33d ]

There is no index which is bigger than UNCORE_PMC_IDX_FIXED. The only
exception is client IMC uncore, which has been specially handled.
For generic code, it is not correct to use >= to check fixed counter.
The code quality issue will bring problem when a new counter index is
introduced.

Signed-off-by: Kan Liang <kan.liang@xxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: acme@xxxxxxxxxx
Cc: eranian@xxxxxxxxxx
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1525371913-10597-3-git-send-email-kan.liang@xxxxxxxxx
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <alexander.levin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
 arch/x86/events/intel/uncore.c |    2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

--- a/arch/x86/events/intel/uncore.c
+++ b/arch/x86/events/intel/uncore.c
@@ -212,7 +212,7 @@ void uncore_perf_event_update(struct int
 	u64 prev_count, new_count, delta;
 	int shift;
 
-	if (event->hw.idx >= UNCORE_PMC_IDX_FIXED)
+	if (event->hw.idx == UNCORE_PMC_IDX_FIXED)
 		shift = 64 - uncore_fixed_ctr_bits(box);
 	else
 		shift = 64 - uncore_perf_ctr_bits(box);