Re: [PATCH 2/2] scsi:qlogicfas408: remove the same check in qlogicfas408_detect

[zhong jiang]

On 2018/8/2 11:21, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> On Thu, 2018-08-02 at 10:45 +ACs-0800, zhong jiang wrote:
>> we should not use same check in a expression. just remove one
>> of them.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: zhong jiang <zhongjiang+AEA-huawei.com>
>> ---
>>  drivers/scsi/qlogicfas408.c +AHw- 3 +ACs---
>>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+ACs-), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/qlogicfas408.c b/drivers/scsi/qlogicfas408.c
>> index 8b471a9..1409ac1 100644
>> --- a/drivers/scsi/qlogicfas408.c
>> +ACsAKwAr- b/drivers/scsi/qlogicfas408.c
>> +AEAAQA- -567,8 +ACs-567,7 +AEAAQA- void qlogicfas408+AF8-setup(int qbase, int id, int int+AF8-type)
>>  int qlogicfas408+AF8-detect(int qbase, int int+AF8-type)
>>  +AHs-
>>          REG1;
>> -	return (((inb(qbase +ACs- 0xe) +AF4- inb(qbase +ACs- 0xe)) == 7) +ACYAJg-
>> -	       ((inb(qbase +ACs- 0xe) +AF4- inb(qbase +ACs- 0xe)) == 7));		
>> +ACs-	return (inb(qbase +ACs- 0xe) +AF4- inb(qbase +ACs- 0xe)) == 7;
>>  +AH0-
> Does inb() have any side effects?
 just redundant. is it necessary for this . Maybe I miss something.

 Thanks,
 zhong jiang
> Bart.
>
>
>