Re: [PATCH v5 10/14] sched/cpufreq: Refactor the utilization aggregation method

[Peter Zijlstra]

On Mon, Jul 30, 2018 at 12:35:27PM -0700, skannan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> On 2018-07-24 05:25, Quentin Perret wrote:
> If it's going to be a different aggregation from what's done for frequency
> guidance, I don't see the point of having this inside schedutil. Why not
> keep it inside the scheduler files? Also, it seems weird to use a governor's
> code when it might not actually be in use. What if someone is using
> ondemand, conservative, performance, etc?

EAS hard relies on schedutil -- I suppose we need a check for that
somewhere and maybe some infrastructure to pin the cpufreq governor.

We're simply not going to support it for anything else.

> > +enum schedutil_type {
> > +	frequency_util,
> > +	energy_util,
> > +};
> 
> Please don't use lower case for enums. It's extremely confusing.

How is that confusing?