Re: [PATCH v1 1/2] pinctrl: tegra: Move drivers registration to arch_init level
From: Linus Walleij
Date: Fri Aug 03 2018 - 13:25:11 EST
On Thu, Aug 2, 2018 at 1:31 PM Stefan Agner <stefan@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> A while back at least using those init lists were not well received even
> for GPIO/pinctrl drivers:
You shouldn't listen too much to that guy he's not trustworthy.
> I still think we should make an exception for GPIO/pinctrl and use
> earlier initcalls. Platform GPIO/pinctrl drivers provide basic
> infrastructure often used by many other drivers, we want to have them
> loaded early. It avoids unnecessary EPROBE_DEFER and hence probably even
> boots faster.
When we have the pin control and GPIO at different initlevels it makes me
uneasy because I feel we have implicit init dependencies that seem more
than a little fragile.
My recent thinking has involved the component method used in DRM drivers
such as drivers/gpu/drm/vc4/vc4_drv.c where a few different component
subdrivers are linked together at bind time (not probe time!) into a master
Rob was no big fan of this but the DRM people like it and I was thinking to
make a try at it.
This way we could at least probe and bind the pin control and GPIO drivers
at the *same* initlevel and express the dependencies between them
> This should definitely go in, at least as a stop gap solution.
Agreed. (And patch applied.)