Re: [PATCH 09/46] dmaengine: cppi41: use dmaenginem_async_device_register to simplify the code

[Huang Shijie]

On Tue, Aug 07, 2018 at 10:01:47AM +0300, Peter Ujfalusi wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> On 2018-08-06 06:28, Huang Shijie wrote:
> It might be only me, but I like to keep the resource teardown in a
> reverse order of their creation. If everything is devm then it is granted.
Yes.

If everything is devm then it is granted..

> 
> In case of cppi4 it looks safe after reading in to the DMAengine core,
> module core and platform core code.
> 
> But does the removed three lines worth over the clarity of how the
> module removal is proceeding?
Please keep the driver as it is if you like the traditional way. :)

The DMA driver's maintainer has the right to decide whether
to use the dmaenginem_async_device_register or not.

Thanks
Huang Shijie