Re: [PATCH v4 4/5] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: add support for non-strict mode

[Robin Murphy]

On 06/08/18 13:27, Zhen Lei wrote:
> Dynamically choose strict or non-strict mode for page table config based
> on the iommu domain type.
>
> Signed-off-by: Zhen Lei <thunder.leizhen@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>   drivers/iommu/arm-smmu-v3.c | 7 ++++++-
>   1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu-v3.c b/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu-v3.c
> index 2f1304b..904bc1e 100644
> --- a/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu-v3.c
> +++ b/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu-v3.c
> @@ -1622,6 +1622,11 @@ static int arm_smmu_domain_finalise(struct iommu_domain *domain)
>   	if (smmu->features & ARM_SMMU_FEAT_COHERENCY)
>   		pgtbl_cfg.quirks = IO_PGTABLE_QUIRK_NO_DMA;
>
> +	if (domain->type == IOMMU_DOMAIN_DMA) {
> +		domain->non_strict = 1;
> +		pgtbl_cfg.quirks |= IO_PGTABLE_QUIRK_NON_STRICT;
> +	}
> +
>   	pgtbl_ops = alloc_io_pgtable_ops(fmt, &pgtbl_cfg, smmu_domain);
>   	if (!pgtbl_ops)
>   		return -ENOMEM;
> @@ -1782,7 +1787,7 @@ static void arm_smmu_iotlb_sync(struct iommu_domain *domain)
>   {
>   	struct arm_smmu_device *smmu = to_smmu_domain(domain)->smmu;
>
> -	if (smmu)
> +	if (smmu && !domain->non_strict)

That doesn't smell right - even in non-strict domains we still need 
stuff like walk cache invalidations for non-leaf unmaps to be 
synchronous, so we can't just ignore all sync operations at the driver 
level. I think the right thing to do to elide the "normal" sync on unmap 
is to first convert __iommu_dma_unmap to use 
iommu_unmap_fast()/iommu_tlb_sync(), then make it not issue that sync at 
all for non-strict domains.

Robin.

>   		__arm_smmu_tlb_sync(smmu);
>   }
>
> --
> 1.8.3