On Thu, 9 Aug 2018 13:49:22 +0200
Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Tue, Aug 07, 2018 at 05:00:01PM +0300, Aapo Vienamo wrote:
Add the HS400 DQS trim value for Tegra186 SDMMC4.
Signed-off-by: Aapo Vienamo <avienamo@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
arch/arm64/boot/dts/nvidia/tegra186.dtsi | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/nvidia/tegra186.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/nvidia/tegra186.dtsi
index 6e9ef26..9e07bc6 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/nvidia/tegra186.dtsi
+++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/nvidia/tegra186.dtsi
@@ -313,6 +313,7 @@
nvidia,pad-autocal-pull-down-offset-1v8-timeout = <0x0a>;
nvidia,default-tap = <0x5>;
nvidia,default-trim = <0x9>;
+ nvidia,dqs-trim = <63>;
status = "disabled";
};
Isn't this technically dependent on the board layout and as such would
belong in the board DTS file? Or does this value work on all existing
Tegra186 platforms?
This value is specified as part of the controller initialization
sequence in the TRM. I've understood that this (and other tap and trim)
value(s) are used for compensating the propagation delay differences
that are caused by the internal SoC layout.
-Aapo
--