[PATCH] mm, oom: task_will_free_mem(current) should retry until memory reserve fails
From: Tetsuo Handa
Date: Thu Aug 09 2018 - 09:49:40 EST
Commit 696453e66630ad45 ("mm, oom: task_will_free_mem should skip
oom_reaped tasks") changed to select next OOM victim as soon as
MMF_OOM_SKIP is set. But we don't need to select next OOM victim as
long as ALLOC_OOM allocation can succeed. And syzbot is hitting WARN(1)
caused by this race window [1].
Since memcg OOM case uses forced charge if current thread is killed,
out_of_memory() can return true without selecting next OOM victim.
Therefore, this patch changes task_will_free_mem(current) to ignore
MMF_OOM_SKIP unless ALLOC_OOM allocation failed.
[1] https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?id=ea8c7912757d253537375e981b61749b2da69258
Signed-off-by: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reported-by: syzbot <syzbot+bab151e82a4e973fa325@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@xxxxxxxx>
Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
include/linux/oom.h | 3 +++
mm/oom_kill.c | 8 ++++----
mm/page_alloc.c | 7 +++++--
3 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/oom.h b/include/linux/oom.h
index 69864a5..b5abacd 100644
--- a/include/linux/oom.h
+++ b/include/linux/oom.h
@@ -38,6 +38,9 @@ struct oom_control {
*/
const int order;
+ /* Did we already try ALLOC_OOM allocation? i*/
+ const bool reserve_tried;
+
/* Used by oom implementation, do not set */
unsigned long totalpages;
struct task_struct *chosen;
diff --git a/mm/oom_kill.c b/mm/oom_kill.c
index 0e10b86..95453e8 100644
--- a/mm/oom_kill.c
+++ b/mm/oom_kill.c
@@ -782,7 +782,7 @@ static inline bool __task_will_free_mem(struct task_struct *task)
* Caller has to make sure that task->mm is stable (hold task_lock or
* it operates on the current).
*/
-static bool task_will_free_mem(struct task_struct *task)
+static bool task_will_free_mem(struct task_struct *task, bool select_new)
{
struct mm_struct *mm = task->mm;
struct task_struct *p;
@@ -803,7 +803,7 @@ static bool task_will_free_mem(struct task_struct *task)
* This task has already been drained by the oom reaper so there are
* only small chances it will free some more
*/
- if (test_bit(MMF_OOM_SKIP, &mm->flags))
+ if (test_bit(MMF_OOM_SKIP, &mm->flags) && select_new)
return false;
if (atomic_read(&mm->mm_users) <= 1)
@@ -939,7 +939,7 @@ static void oom_kill_process(struct oom_control *oc, const char *message)
* so it can die quickly
*/
task_lock(p);
- if (task_will_free_mem(p)) {
+ if (task_will_free_mem(p, true)) {
mark_oom_victim(p);
wake_oom_reaper(p);
task_unlock(p);
@@ -1069,7 +1069,7 @@ bool out_of_memory(struct oom_control *oc)
* select it. The goal is to allow it to allocate so that it may
* quickly exit and free its memory.
*/
- if (task_will_free_mem(current)) {
+ if (task_will_free_mem(current, oc->reserve_tried)) {
mark_oom_victim(current);
wake_oom_reaper(current);
return true;
diff --git a/mm/page_alloc.c b/mm/page_alloc.c
index 879b861..03ca29a 100644
--- a/mm/page_alloc.c
+++ b/mm/page_alloc.c
@@ -3455,7 +3455,7 @@ void warn_alloc(gfp_t gfp_mask, nodemask_t *nodemask, const char *fmt, ...)
}
static inline struct page *
-__alloc_pages_may_oom(gfp_t gfp_mask, unsigned int order,
+__alloc_pages_may_oom(gfp_t gfp_mask, unsigned int order, bool reserve_tried,
const struct alloc_context *ac, unsigned long *did_some_progress)
{
struct oom_control oc = {
@@ -3464,6 +3464,7 @@ void warn_alloc(gfp_t gfp_mask, nodemask_t *nodemask, const char *fmt, ...)
.memcg = NULL,
.gfp_mask = gfp_mask,
.order = order,
+ .reserve_tried = reserve_tried,
};
struct page *page;
@@ -4239,7 +4240,9 @@ bool gfp_pfmemalloc_allowed(gfp_t gfp_mask)
goto retry_cpuset;
/* Reclaim has failed us, start killing things */
- page = __alloc_pages_may_oom(gfp_mask, order, ac, &did_some_progress);
+ page = __alloc_pages_may_oom(gfp_mask, order, alloc_flags == ALLOC_OOM
+ || (gfp_mask & __GFP_NOMEMALLOC), ac,
+ &did_some_progress);
if (page)
goto got_pg;
--
1.8.3.1