Re: [PATCH] x86/ACPI/cstate: Output AMD on APCI C1 FFH MWAIT AMD systems

From: Len Brown
Date: Thu Aug 09 2018 - 12:26:13 EST

Next message: Naveen N. Rao: "Re: [PATCH] perf probe powerpc: Fix trace event post-processing"
Previous message: Arkadiusz Lis: "[PATCH] Staging: One Laptop Per Child: add function argument names"
In reply to: Prarit Bhargava: "Re: [PATCH] x86/ACPI/cstate: Output AMD on APCI C1 FFH MWAIT AMD systems"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

>> "ACPI FFH INTEL MWAIT 0x%x"

> Should we drop INTEL from the above or not (as suggested later in this thread)?
> It feels like everyone is on the fence about it.

Okay with me to drop the "INTEL" part of this string -- it actually
doesn't add any information.

thanks,
-Len

Next message: Naveen N. Rao: "Re: [PATCH] perf probe powerpc: Fix trace event post-processing"
Previous message: Arkadiusz Lis: "[PATCH] Staging: One Laptop Per Child: add function argument names"
In reply to: Prarit Bhargava: "Re: [PATCH] x86/ACPI/cstate: Output AMD on APCI C1 FFH MWAIT AMD systems"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]