Re: [PATCH] Cleanup "fat: propagate 64-bit inode timestamps" patch

[Arnd Bergmann]

On Sat, Aug 18, 2018 at 2:34 AM OGAWA Hirofumi
<hirofumi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Looks like I missed the email to read for a patch
> (mmots/broken-out/fat-propagate-64-bit-inode-timestamps.patch).  Well,
> so FWIW,
>
> Acked-by: OGAWA Hirofumi <hirofumi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> And additionally cleanup patch here (this would be better to be folded
> into his patch).
>
> Thanks.
> --
> OGAWA Hirofumi <hirofumi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> [PATCH] Cleanup "fat: propagate 64-bit inode timestamps" patch
>
> - Remove useless temporary variable
> - Remove needless long long
>
> Signed-off-by: OGAWA Hirofumi <hirofumi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Acked-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx>

>  /* Linear day numbers of the respective 1sts in non-leap years. */
> -static time64_t days_in_year[] = {
> +static long days_in_year[] = {
>         /* Jan  Feb  Mar  Apr  May  Jun  Jul  Aug  Sep  Oct  Nov  Dec */
>         0,   0,  31,  59,  90, 120, 151, 181, 212, 243, 273, 304, 334, 0, 0, 0,
>  };

While this is correct, changing it back to a signed 'long' type seems
rather arbitrary. I tried to pick a type that would be the same on 32-bit
and 64-bit architectures, the other choice would have been 'u16',
which saves a few bytes.

A completely different approach would be to just use mktime()
and avoid reimplementing it.

     Arnd