Re: at91 git tree in linux-next

[Stephen Rothwell]

Hi all,

On Wed, 22 Aug 2018 14:47:56 +0200 Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Alexandre Ludovic and myself are the group of maintainers for Microchip 
> ARM SoCs. The current tree that we have in linux-next is mine [1] and we 
> are moving to a common group kernel.org tree.
> 
> So, can you please add our new tree to linux-next:
> at91 git 
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/at91/linux.git#at91-next
> 
> instead of:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/nferre/linux-at91.git#at91-next
> 
> In addition to that, we also have now a "fixes" branch. Can you please 
> add it to your "fixes" tree?
> 
> at91 git 
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/at91/linux.git#at91-fixes
> 
> Thanks for your help, best regards,
>    Nicolas
> 
> 
> [1] 
> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git/tree/Next/Trees#n84

All done.  I added Alexandre and Ludovic as contacts for both trees as
well.

Thanks for adding your subsystem tree as a participant of linux-next.  As
you may know, this is not a judgement of your code.  The purpose of
linux-next is for integration testing and to lower the impact of
conflicts between subsystems in the next merge window. 

You will need to ensure that the patches/commits in your tree/series have
been:
     * submitted under GPL v2 (or later) and include the Contributor's
        Signed-off-by,
     * posted to the relevant mailing list,
     * reviewed by you (or another maintainer of your subsystem tree),
     * successfully unit tested, and 
     * destined for the current or next Linux merge window.

Basically, this should be just what you would send to Linus (or ask him
to fetch).  It is allowed to be rebased if you deem it necessary.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell 
sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Attachment: pgpn9jzXRbYHQ.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature