[PATCH 4.14 058/217] enic: initialize enic->rfs_h.lock in enic_probe
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Date: Thu Aug 23 2018 - 04:20:47 EST
4.14-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Govindarajulu Varadarajan <gvaradar@xxxxxxxxx>
[ Upstream commit 3256d29fc7aecdf99feb1cb9475ed2252769a8a7 ]
lockdep spotted that we are using rfs_h.lock in enic_get_rxnfc() without
initializing. rfs_h.lock is initialized in enic_open(). But ethtool_ops
can be called when interface is down.
Move enic_rfs_flw_tbl_init to enic_probe.
INFO: trying to register non-static key.
the code is fine but needs lockdep annotation.
turning off the locking correctness validator.
CPU: 18 PID: 1189 Comm: ethtool Not tainted 4.17.0-rc7-devel+ #27
Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.11.0-20171110_100015-anatol 04/01/2014
Call Trace:
dump_stack+0x85/0xc0
register_lock_class+0x550/0x560
? __handle_mm_fault+0xa8b/0x1100
__lock_acquire+0x81/0x670
lock_acquire+0xb9/0x1e0
? enic_get_rxnfc+0x139/0x2b0 [enic]
_raw_spin_lock_bh+0x38/0x80
? enic_get_rxnfc+0x139/0x2b0 [enic]
enic_get_rxnfc+0x139/0x2b0 [enic]
ethtool_get_rxnfc+0x8d/0x1c0
dev_ethtool+0x16c8/0x2400
? __mutex_lock+0x64d/0xa00
? dev_load+0x6a/0x150
dev_ioctl+0x253/0x4b0
sock_do_ioctl+0x9a/0x130
sock_ioctl+0x1af/0x350
do_vfs_ioctl+0x8e/0x670
? syscall_trace_enter+0x1e2/0x380
ksys_ioctl+0x60/0x90
__x64_sys_ioctl+0x16/0x20
do_syscall_64+0x5a/0x170
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xbe
Signed-off-by: Govindarajulu Varadarajan <gvaradar@xxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <alexander.levin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/net/ethernet/cisco/enic/enic_clsf.c | 3 +--
drivers/net/ethernet/cisco/enic/enic_main.c | 3 ++-
2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/cisco/enic/enic_clsf.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/cisco/enic/enic_clsf.c
@@ -79,7 +79,6 @@ void enic_rfs_flw_tbl_init(struct enic *
enic->rfs_h.max = enic->config.num_arfs;
enic->rfs_h.free = enic->rfs_h.max;
enic->rfs_h.toclean = 0;
- enic_rfs_timer_start(enic);
}
void enic_rfs_flw_tbl_free(struct enic *enic)
@@ -88,7 +87,6 @@ void enic_rfs_flw_tbl_free(struct enic *
enic_rfs_timer_stop(enic);
spin_lock_bh(&enic->rfs_h.lock);
- enic->rfs_h.free = 0;
for (i = 0; i < (1 << ENIC_RFS_FLW_BITSHIFT); i++) {
struct hlist_head *hhead;
struct hlist_node *tmp;
@@ -99,6 +97,7 @@ void enic_rfs_flw_tbl_free(struct enic *
enic_delfltr(enic, n->fltr_id);
hlist_del(&n->node);
kfree(n);
+ enic->rfs_h.free++;
}
}
spin_unlock_bh(&enic->rfs_h.lock);
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/cisco/enic/enic_main.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/cisco/enic/enic_main.c
@@ -1930,7 +1930,7 @@ static int enic_open(struct net_device *
vnic_intr_unmask(&enic->intr[i]);
enic_notify_timer_start(enic);
- enic_rfs_flw_tbl_init(enic);
+ enic_rfs_timer_start(enic);
return 0;
@@ -2854,6 +2854,7 @@ static int enic_probe(struct pci_dev *pd
enic->notify_timer.function = enic_notify_timer;
enic->notify_timer.data = (unsigned long)enic;
+ enic_rfs_flw_tbl_init(enic);
enic_set_rx_coal_setting(enic);
INIT_WORK(&enic->reset, enic_reset);
INIT_WORK(&enic->tx_hang_reset, enic_tx_hang_reset);