Re: [PATCH v3 3/3] KVM: s390: vsie: Make use of CRYCB FORMAT2 clear
From: David Hildenbrand
Date: Thu Aug 23 2018 - 07:21:13 EST
On 23.08.2018 13:05, Janosch Frank wrote:
> On 8/23/18 12:25 PM, Pierre Morel wrote:
>> The comment preceding the shadow_crycb function is
>> misleading, we effectively accept FORMAT2 CRYCB in the
>> guest.
>
> I beg to differ:
>
> if (!(crycbd_o & vcpu->arch.sie_block->crycbd & CRYCB_FORMAT1))
> return 0;
FORMAT2 includes bit FORMAT1 (backwards compatible)
>
>>
>> When using FORMAT2 in the host we do not need to or with
>> FORMAT1.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Pierre Morel <pmorel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>> arch/s390/kvm/vsie.c | 6 +++---
>> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/s390/kvm/vsie.c b/arch/s390/kvm/vsie.c
>> index 38ea5da..e0e6fbf 100644
>> --- a/arch/s390/kvm/vsie.c
>> +++ b/arch/s390/kvm/vsie.c
>> @@ -140,7 +140,8 @@ static int prepare_cpuflags(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct vsie_page *vsie_page)
>> * Create a shadow copy of the crycb block and setup key wrapping, if
>> * requested for guest 3 and enabled for guest 2.
>> *
>> - * We only accept format-1 (no AP in g2), but convert it into format-2
>> + * We accept format-1 or format-2, but we treat it as a format-1 (no AP in g2),
>> + * and we convert it into format-2 in the shadow CRYCB.
>> * There is nothing to do for format-0.
>> *
>> * Returns: - 0 if shadowed or nothing to do
>> @@ -179,8 +180,7 @@ static int shadow_crycb(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct vsie_page *vsie_page)
>> return set_validity_icpt(scb_s, 0x0035U);
>>
>> scb_s->ecb3 |= ecb3_flags;
>> - scb_s->crycbd = ((__u32)(__u64) &vsie_page->crycb) | CRYCB_FORMAT1 |
>> - CRYCB_FORMAT2;
>> + scb_s->crycbd = ((__u32)(__u64) &vsie_page->crycb) | CRYCB_FORMAT2;
>
> That's purely cosmetic but valid.
>
>>
>> /* xor both blocks in one run */
>> b1 = (unsigned long *) vsie_page->crycb.dea_wrapping_key_mask;
Reviewed-by: David Hildenbrand <david@xxxxxxxxxx>
--
Thanks,
David / dhildenb