Re: efisubsys_init takes more than a few milliseconds
From: Ard Biesheuvel
Date: Thu Aug 23 2018 - 10:50:51 EST
On 22 August 2018 at 15:18, Paul Menzel <pmenzel+linux-efi@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Dear Ard,
>
>
> On 03/25/18 17:21, Paul Menzel wrote:
>
>> On 03/25/2018 09:41 AM, Paul Menzel wrote:
>>
>>> On 03/24/2018 11:35 PM, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 24 March 2018 at 22:10, Paul Menzel wrote:
>>
>>>>> According to `initcall_debug`, `efisubsys_init` takes more than a few
>>>>> milliseconds to execute on a Dell XPS 13 9370 (Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-8550U CPU @ 1.80GHz).
>>>>>
>>>>>> ```
>>>>>> [â]
>>>>>> [ 0.144474] calling efisubsys_init+0x0/0x2cf @ 1
>>>>>> [ 0.144474] Registered efivars operations
>>>>>> [ 0.173690] initcall efisubsys_init+0x0/0x2cf returned 0 after 27343 usecs
>>>>>> [â]
>>>>>> ```
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> To get a vanilla Linux kernel to boot in well under one second, itâd be nice
>>>>> if the time could be improved. Do you know, why it takes so long?
>>>>>
>>>>> According to `bootgraph.py` from pm-graph [1][2] it takes even a little
>>>>> longer.
>>>>>
>>>>>> efisubsys_init: start=690.841, end=720.493, length(w/o overhead)=31.250
>>>>>> ms, return=0
>>>>>
>>>>> There are several dozen calls to `virt_efi_get_next_variable()` all but one
>>>>> taking around 0.335 ms. This path needs to be optimized. Is that possible?
>>>>
>>>> That depends. These are firmware calls, so to make these calls faster,
>>>> you need to modify the firmware, not the kernel.
>>>
>>> Yeah, unfortunately, no free firmware runs on this laptop, and Dell doesnât respond to these kind of reports, as they think, itâs not important.
>>>
>>>> We may be able to make more intrusive changes to get rid of this
>>>> delay, e.g., spin up a special kernel thread, but I'd have to check in
>>>> more detail.
>>>
>>> Thatâd be great.
>
> On the MSI B350M MORTAR (MS-7A37) it takes even longer, almost 50 ms.
>
> ```
> [ 0.204009] calling efisubsys_init+0x0/0x30a @ 1
> [ 0.204009] Registered efivars operations
> [ 0.252262] initcall efisubsys_init+0x0/0x30a returned 0 after 46875 usecs
> ```
>
> If a solution could be found to move this out of the hotpath, thatâd be great.
> But I am not sure, if threads can be used that early.
>
Could you narrow this down? Which call in efisubsys_init() is taking
up all this time?