Re: [PATCH] arm64: dts: Fix various entry-method properties to reflect documentation

[Sudeep Holla]

Hi Amit,

Thanks for fixing this.

On Thu, Aug 23, 2018 at 02:23:29PM +0530, Amit Kucheria wrote:
> The idle-states binding documentation[1] mentions that the
> 'entry-method' property is required on 64-bit platforms and must be
> set to "psci".
>
> commit a13f18f59d26 ("Documentation: arm: Fix typo in the idle-states
> bindings examples") attempted to fix this earlier but clearly more is
> needed.
>

In fact, I assumed I fixed things with commit 978fa436231a ("drivers:
firmware: psci: unify enable-method binding on ARM {64,32}-bit systems"),
but I was wrong. I left quite a few instances including juno dtbs.

> Fix the cpu-capacity.txt documentation that uses the incorrect value so
> we don't get copy-paste errors like these. Clarify the language in
> idle-states.txt by removing the reference to the psci bindings that
> might be causing this confusion.
>
> Finally, fix devicetrees of various boards to reflect current
> documentation.
>
> [1] Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/idle-states.txt (see
> idle-states node)
>
> Signed-off-by: Amit Kucheria <amit.kucheria@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/cpu-capacity.txt | 2 +-
>  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/idle-states.txt  | 4 ++--
>  arch/arm64/boot/dts/arm/juno-r1.dts                    | 2 +-
>  arch/arm64/boot/dts/arm/juno-r2.dts                    | 2 +-
>  arch/arm64/boot/dts/arm/juno.dts                       | 2 +-

For all the above files,

Acked-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@xxxxxxx>

How do you plan to merge ? I prefer if you can send it via arm-soc as
fixes for this cycle with all the necessary acks. Otherwise you may have
to split this to send via platform maintainers which is bit mundane.

--
Regards,
Sudeep