Re: [PATCH] Properly interpret indirect call in perf annotate.

[Kim Phillips]

On Thu, 23 Aug 2018 14:29:34 +0200
Martin LiÅka <mliska@xxxxxxx> wrote:

> The patch changes interpretation of:
> callq  *0x8(%rbx)
> 
> from:
>   0.26 â     â callq  *8
> to:
>   0.26 â     â callq  *0x8(%rbx)
> 
> in this can an address is followed by a register, thus
> one can't parse only address.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Martin LiÅka <mliska@xxxxxxx>
> ---

Tested this doesn't incur any grievances parsing aarch64 code:

Tested-by: Kim Phillips <kim.phillips@xxxxxxx>

Thanks,

Kim