Re: [PATCH] perf annotate: fix parsing aarch64 branch instructions after objdump update

[Kim Phillips]

On Fri, 24 Aug 2018 09:59:22 +0200
Thomas-Mich Richter <tmricht@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> On 08/24/2018 02:10 AM, Kim Phillips wrote:
> > Tested no difference in output for sample x86_64, power arch perf.data files.
> 
> Tested,  no difference in output on s390. Just to let you know.

Thanks!  An official Tested-by: tag would help keep acme from guessing
whether he should convert these less-officially sounding types of
emails in the future.  I doubt your official Tested-by implies you
necessarily have had to claim you fully tested it on e.g., x86-64, esp.
if your Tested-by is in such context as provided above.

BTW, if you want to send me an s390 perf.data file and the file
resulting from 'perf archive', and a matching vmlinux in an off-list
email, I can add it to my perf-archives arsenal for future testing.

Again, thanks for testing!

Kim