Re: [PATCH v13 04/13] x86/sgx: Architectural structures

[Dave Hansen]

> +/**
> + * enum sgx_encls_leaves - return codes for ENCLS, ENCLU and ENCLV
> + * %SGX_SUCCESS:		No error.
> + * %SGX_INVALID_SIG_STRUCT:	SIGSTRUCT contains an invalid value.
> + * %SGX_INVALID_ATTRIBUTE:	Enclave is not attempting to access a resource
> + *				for which it is not authorized.
> + * %SGX_BLKSTATE:		EPC page is already blocked.
> + * %SGX_INVALID_MEASUREMENT:	SIGSTRUCT or EINITTOKEN contains an incorrect
> + *				measurement.
...
> +enum sgx_return_codes {
> +	SGX_SUCCESS			= 0,
> +	SGX_INVALID_SIG_STRUCT		= 1,
> +	SGX_INVALID_ATTRIBUTE		= 2,
> +	SGX_BLKSTATE			= 3,
> +	SGX_INVALID_MEASUREMENT		= 4,
...

I don't think I've ever seen this particular method of commenting
before.  It's rather verbose and duplicates the names twice, which seems
a bit silly.

Can you talk a bit about why you chose to do it this way?  I'd
personally much rather see at least some brief comments inline with the
definitions.