Re: [PATCH RFT] net: dsa: Allow configuring CPU port VLANs

From: Florian Fainelli
Date: Tue Aug 28 2018 - 12:58:15 EST

On 08/28/2018 01:32 AM, Ilias Apalodimas wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 10, 2018 at 04:58:10PM -0700, Florian Fainelli wrote:
>> On 06/25/2018 02:17 AM, Ilias Apalodimas wrote:
>>> On Mon, Jun 25, 2018 at 12:13:10PM +0300, Petr Machata wrote:
>>>> Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
>>>>> if (netif_is_bridge_master(vlan->obj.orig_dev))
>>>>> - return -EOPNOTSUPP;
>>>>> + info.port = dp->cpu_dp->index;
>>>> The condition above will trigger also when a VLAN is added on a member
>>>> port, and there's no other port with that VLAN. In that case the VLAN
>>>> comes without the BRIDGE_VLAN_INFO_BRENTRY flag. In mlxsw we have this
>>>> to get the bridge VLANs:
>>>> if (netif_is_bridge_master(orig_dev)) {
>>>> [...]
>>>> if ((vlan->flags & BRIDGE_VLAN_INFO_BRENTRY) &&
>>>> [...]
>>>> This doesn't appear to be done in DSA unless I'm missing something.
>>> Petr's right. This will trigger for VLANs added on 'not cpu ports' if the VLAN
>>> is not already a member.
>>> This command has BRIDGE_VLAN_INFO_BRENTRY set:
>>> bridge vlan add dev br0 vid 100 pvid untagged self
>>> I had the same issue on my CPSW RFC and solved it
>>> exactly the same was as Petr suggested.
>> Humm, there must be something obvious I am missing, but the following
>> don't exactly result in what I would expect after adding a check for
>> vlan->flags & BRIDGE_VLAN_INFO_BRENTRY:
>> brctl addbr br0
>> echo 1 > /sys/class/net/br0/bridge/vlan_filtering
>> brctl addif br0 lan1
>> #1 results in lan1 being programmed with VID 1, PVID, untagged, but not
>> the CPU port. I would have sort of expected that the bridge layer would
>> also push the configuration to br0/CPU port since this is the default VLAN:
>> bridge vlan show dev br0
>> port vlan ids
>> br0 1 PVID Egress Untagged
>> But it does not.
>> bridge vlan add vid 2 dev lan1
>> #2 same thing, results in only lan1 being programmed with VID 2, tagged
>> but that is expected because we are creating the VLAN only for the
>> user-facing port.
>> bridge vlan add vid 3 dev br0 self
>> #3 results in the CPU port being programmed with VID 3, tagged, again,
>> this is expected because we are only programming the bridge master/CPU
>> port here.
>> Does #1 also happen for cpsw and mlxsw or do you actually get events
>> about the bridge's default VLAN configuration? Or does the switch driver
>> actually need to obtain that at the time the port is enslaved somehow?
> As long as ports are attached you get the events (one event per attached port
> iirc)
> if the event is checked against BRIDGE_VLAN_INFO_BRENTRY, the only way to add a
> VLAN to the cpu port is via 'bridge vlan add vid 3 dev br0 self'

Do we have a guarantee that upon port enslavement, whatever default_pvid
is configured on the bridge master device also happens to be the port's
default_pvid settings as well?