Re: [PATCH 1/2] fs/dcache: Track & report number of negative dentries
From: Dave Chinner
Date: Wed Aug 29 2018 - 21:44:14 EST
On Wed, Aug 29, 2018 at 01:11:08PM -0400, Waiman Long wrote:
> On 08/28/2018 08:11 PM, Dave Chinner wrote:
> > On Tue, Aug 28, 2018 at 01:19:39PM -0400, Waiman Long wrote:
> >> The current dentry number tracking code doesn't distinguish between
> >> positive & negative dentries. It just reports the total number of
> >> dentries in the LRU lists.
> >>
> >> As excessive number of negative dentries can have an impact on system
> >> performance, it will be wise to track the number of positive and
> >> negative dentries separately.
> >>
> >> This patch adds tracking for the total number of negative dentries in
> >> the system LRU lists and reports it in the /proc/sys/fs/dentry-state
> >> file. The number, however, does not include negative dentries that are
> >> in flight but not in the LRU yet.
> >>
> >> The number of positive dentries in the LRU lists can be roughly found
> >> by subtracting the number of negative dentries from the total.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Waiman Long <longman@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >> ---
> >> Documentation/sysctl/fs.txt | 19 +++++++++++++------
> >> fs/dcache.c | 45 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >> include/linux/dcache.h | 7 ++++---
> >> 3 files changed, 62 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/Documentation/sysctl/fs.txt b/Documentation/sysctl/fs.txt
> >> index 819caf8..118bb93 100644
> >> --- a/Documentation/sysctl/fs.txt
> >> +++ b/Documentation/sysctl/fs.txt
> >> @@ -63,19 +63,26 @@ struct {
> >> int nr_unused;
> >> int age_limit; /* age in seconds */
> >> int want_pages; /* pages requested by system */
> >> - int dummy[2];
> >> + int nr_negative; /* # of unused negative dentries */
> >> + int dummy;
> >> } dentry_stat = {0, 0, 45, 0,};
> > That's not a backwards compatible ABI change. Those dummy fields
> > used to represent some metric we no longer calculate, and there are
> > probably still monitoring apps out there that think they still have
> > the old meaning. i.e. they are still visible to userspace:
> >
> > $ cat /proc/sys/fs/dentry-state
> > 83090 67661 45 0 0 0
> > $
> >
> > IOWs, you can add new fields for new metrics to the end of the
> > structure, but you can't re-use existing fields even if they
> > aren't calculated anymore.
> >
> > [....]
>
> I looked up the git history and the state of the dentry_stat structure
> hadn't changed since it was first put into git in 2.6.12-rc2 on Apr 16,
> 2005. That was over 13 years ago. Even adding an extra argument can have
> the potential of breaking old applications depending on how the parsing
> code was written.
I'm pretty we've had this discussion many times before w.r.t.
/proc/self/mount* and other multi-field proc files.
IIRC, The answer has always been that it's OK to extend lines with
new fields as existing apps /should/ ignore them, but it's not OK to
remove or redefine existing fields in the line because existing apps
/will/ misinterpret what that field means.
> Given that systems that are still using some very old tools are not
> likely to upgrade to the latest kernel anyway. I don't see that as a big
> problem.
I don't think that matters when it comes to changing what
information we expose in proc files.
Cheers,
Dave.
--
Dave Chinner
david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx