Re: [PATCH] 9p: Rename req to rreq
From: Dominique Martinet
Date: Mon Sep 03 2018 - 18:41:46 EST
Tomas Bortoli wrote on Mon, Sep 03, 2018:
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] 9p: Rename req to rreq
I feel this is a bit too vague, how about either of these?
'9p: Rename req to rreq in trans_fd'
or
'9p/fd: Rename req to rreq'
We still have plenty of 'req' in client.c and all other transports, so
it would feel like a lie otherwise :)
> In struct p9_conn, rename req to rreq as it is used by the read routine.
>
> Signed-off-by: Tomas Bortoli <tomasbortoli@xxxxxxxxx>
> Suggested-by: Jun Piao <piaojun@xxxxxxxxxx>
Nitpick on title aside LGTM, I've picked this up for linux-next
--
Dominique