Re: [PATCH 0/5] Remove sh_mobile_ceu_camera from arch/sh

[jacopo mondi]

Hi again Sakari,
   sorry, I'm confusing you

On Mon, Sep 03, 2018 at 09:22:34AM +0200, jacopo mondi wrote:
> Hi Sakari,
>
> On Fri, Aug 31, 2018 at 03:25:58PM +0300, Sakari Ailus wrote:
> > Hi Jacopo,
> >
> > On Mon, May 28, 2018 at 06:37:06PM +0200, Jacopo Mondi wrote:
> > > Hello,
> > >     this series removes dependencies on the soc_camera based
> > > sh_mobile_ceu_camera driver from 3 board files in arch/sh and from one
> > > sensor driver used by one of those boards.
> > >
> > > Hans, this means there are no more user of the soc_camera framework that I know
> > > of in Linux, and I guess we can now plan of to remove that framework.
> >
> > What's the status of this set? I think it'd be nice to get it in; the CEU
> > driver is the last using SoC camera framework.
> >

The series went in in the media tree in late June and I now see it in
v4.19-rc2.

Sorry for the confusion.

The other soc_camera series which is pending for approval is the one
removing dependencies on the framework from some SH defconfigs:
https://lkml.org/lkml/2018/7/4/323

Mauro was exitant to take this one through the media tree, and he's
probably right SH maintainers should at least ack the series. So far,
I haven't heard from them.

I'll try to rebase it on latest version and re-send.

Thanks
   j

>
> There's an open comment from Geert on this series.
> I'll resend, then I guess it can be collected.
>
> > I guess an ack from the SH folks would be needed for these patches to go
> > through the media tree.
> >
>
> I would have loved to hear from them on this and other media patches
> which are sh-related. It hasn't happen, and as for the previous patches
> removing usage of the old ceu driver for SH boards, I guess this can go in
> through the media tree. But I let Hans decide how to handle this.
>
> > On the sensor driver patches --- please just move the files. The CEU was
> > the last that it was possible to use the drivers with.
> >
>
> My understanding was that Hans preferred to do it after all
> dependencies are moved away from soc_camera.
>
> Maybe at ELC-E we should have a status-check and decide how to move
> forward with soc_camera deprecation.
>
> Thanks
>    j
>
> > --
> > Kind regards,
> >
> > Sakari Ailus
> > e-mail: sakari.ailus@xxxxxx

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature