Re: [PATCH v13 04/13] x86/sgx: Architectural structures

[Dave Hansen]

On 09/03/2018 06:16 AM, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
>> +       EBLOCK  = 0x9,
>> +       EPA     = 0xA,
>> +       EWB     = 0xB,
>> +       ETRACK  = 0xC,
>> +       EAUG    = 0xD,
>> +       EMODPR  = 0xE,
>> +       EMODT   = 0xF,
>> +};
> Hmm... This E prefix confuses me with (system wide) error codes. Has
> it been discussed before? If so, can you point on the conclusion why
> the current format is good?

Making them SGX_EWHATEVER isn't a horrible idea.