Re: [PATCH v13 11/13] platform/x86: Intel SGX driver

[Jarkko Sakkinen]

On Wed, Sep 05, 2018 at 08:36:54PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 5, 2018 at 8:34 PM Jarkko Sakkinen
> <jarkko.sakkinen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > On Tue, Sep 04, 2018 at 08:59:58PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > > On Mon, Aug 27, 2018 at 9:58 PM Jarkko Sakkinen
> > > <jarkko.sakkinen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> > Thanks, very detailed! Does not make sense to ack these separately so I
> > just say that I try to fix them all with care.
> 
> Just comment on which you disagree.
> I think one of them is the header file location. It seems I missed
> it's current place.
> 
> -- 
> With Best Regards,
> Andy Shevchenko

Ah, right, sorry forgot to comment it in LKML.

There is another open. If I grep through the kernel tree I see SPDX
headers that are decorated both with C99- and C89-style comments. I
guess I ended up using C99-style because when I was instructed to add
SPDX headers in the first place that was the example I was given. Still
checkpatch.pl complains about C99-style comments.

Which one is right and why the kernel tree is polluted with C99-headers
when they do not pass checkpatch.pl? How those commits were ever
accepted?

/Jarkko