[PATCH 4.14 29/89] dm integrity: change suspending variable from bool to int

[Greg Kroah-Hartman]

4.14-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka@xxxxxxxxxx>

commit c21b16392701543d61e366dca84e15fe7f0cf0cf upstream.

Early alpha processors can't write a byte or short atomically - they
read 8 bytes, modify the byte or two bytes in registers and write back
8 bytes.

The modification of the variable "suspending" may race with
modification of the variable "failed".  Fix this by changing
"suspending" to an int.

Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Signed-off-by: Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

---
 drivers/md/dm-integrity.c |    6 +++---
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

--- a/drivers/md/dm-integrity.c
+++ b/drivers/md/dm-integrity.c
@@ -177,7 +177,7 @@ struct dm_integrity_c {
 	__u8 sectors_per_block;
 
 	unsigned char mode;
-	bool suspending;
+	int suspending;
 
 	int failed;
 
@@ -2209,7 +2209,7 @@ static void dm_integrity_postsuspend(str
 
 	del_timer_sync(&ic->autocommit_timer);
 
-	ic->suspending = true;
+	WRITE_ONCE(ic->suspending, 1);
 
 	queue_work(ic->commit_wq, &ic->commit_work);
 	drain_workqueue(ic->commit_wq);
@@ -2219,7 +2219,7 @@ static void dm_integrity_postsuspend(str
 		dm_integrity_flush_buffers(ic);
 	}
 
-	ic->suspending = false;
+	WRITE_ONCE(ic->suspending, 0);
 
 	BUG_ON(!RB_EMPTY_ROOT(&ic->in_progress));