Re: [PATCH v2 3/5] irqchip: RISC-V Local Interrupt Controller Driver

[Christoph Hellwig]

On Mon, Sep 10, 2018 at 09:37:59PM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> Processor local interrupts really should be architected and there are
> really not that many of them.

And that is what they are.

> But well, RISC-V decided obvsiouly not to learn from mistakes made by
> others.

I don't think that is the case.  I think Atup misreads what reserved
means - if you look at section 2.3 of the RISC-V privileged spec
it clearly states that reserved fields are for future use and not
for vendor specific use.