Re: [PATCH v2] ARM64: dts: meson-gxbb-wetek: add ttyAML1 uart for Bluetooth

[Rob Herring]

On Mon, Sep 10, 2018 at 1:30 PM Martin Blumenstingl
<martin.blumenstingl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Hi Rob,
>
> On Fri, Sep 7, 2018 at 2:16 PM Christian Hewitt
> <christianshewitt@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > This change adds the uart_A used by the brmcfmac sdio module in the
> > WeTek Hub and WeTek Play 2 devices. meson_uart_probe seems to mandate
> > an alias (without it, BT is not working) so this is also included.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Christian Hewitt <christianshewitt@xxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> >  arch/arm64/boot/dts/amlogic/meson-gxbb-wetek.dtsi | 13 +++++++++++++
> >  1 file changed, 13 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/amlogic/meson-gxbb-wetek.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/amlogic/meson-gxbb-wetek.dtsi
> > index 70325b2..e75ace7 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/amlogic/meson-gxbb-wetek.dtsi
> > +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/amlogic/meson-gxbb-wetek.dtsi
> > @@ -10,6 +10,7 @@
> >  / {
> >         aliases {
> >                 serial0 = &uart_AO;
> > +               serial1 = &uart_A;
> >                 ethernet0 = &ethmac;
> >         };
> >
> > @@ -239,6 +240,18 @@
> >         vqmmc-supply = <&vddio_boot>;
> >  };
> >
> > +/* This is connected to the Bluetooth module: */
> > +&uart_A {
> > +       status = "okay";
> > +       pinctrl-0 = <&uart_a_pins>, <&uart_a_cts_rts_pins>;
> > +       pinctrl-names = "default";
> > +
> > +       bluetooth {
> > +               compatible = "brcm,bcm43438-bt";
> I have a question regarding the Broadcom Bluetooth compatible strings:
> Christian mentioned earlier that the Bluetooth controller identifies
> itself as BCM4335C0 (BCM4335 rev. C0)
>
> do we need to add a new compatible string (to
> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/broadcom-bluetooth.txt)?

Probably so. Without, how do you determine firmware filenames for example?

> if yes: should we also add a new of_device_id to hci_bcm.c or should
> board.dts simply use compatible = "brcm,bcm4335c0-bt",
> "brcm,bcm43438-bt"?

A fallback is fine. I'd probably drop the 'c0' part. Is that readable
from a register?

Rob