Re: [PATCH 06/11] compat_ioctl: remove /dev/random commands

[Martin Schwidefsky]

On Tue, 11 Sep 2018 22:26:54 +0200
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx> wrote:

> On Sun, Sep 9, 2018 at 6:12 AM Al Viro <viro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > On Sat, Sep 08, 2018 at 04:28:12PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:  
> > > These are all handled by the random driver, so instead of listing
> > > each ioctl, we can just use the same function to deal with both
> > > native and compat commands.  
> >
> > Umm...  I don't think it's right -
> >  
> > >       .unlocked_ioctl = random_ioctl,
> > > +     .compat_ioctl = random_ioctl,  
> >
> >  
> > ->compat_ioctl() gets called in  
> >                         error = f.file->f_op->compat_ioctl(f.file, cmd, arg);
> > so you do *NOT* get compat_ptr() for those - they have to do it on their
> > own.  It's not hard to provide a proper compat_ioctl() instance for that
> > one, but this is not it.  What you need in drivers/char/random.c part of
> > that one is something like  
> 
> Looping in some s390 folks.
> 
> As you suggested in another reply, I had a look at what other drivers
> do the same thing and have only pointer arguments. I created a
> patch to move them all over to using a new helper function that
> adds the compat_ptr(), and arrived at
> 
>  drivers/android/binder.c                    | 2 +-
>  drivers/crypto/qat/qat_common/adf_ctl_drv.c | 2 +-
>  drivers/dma-buf/dma-buf.c                   | 4 +---
>  drivers/dma-buf/sw_sync.c                   | 2 +-
>  drivers/dma-buf/sync_file.c                 | 2 +-
>  drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_chardev.c    | 2 +-
>  drivers/hid/hidraw.c                        | 4 +---
>  drivers/iio/industrialio-core.c             | 2 +-
>  drivers/infiniband/core/uverbs_main.c       | 4 ++--
>  drivers/media/rc/lirc_dev.c                 | 4 +---
>  drivers/mfd/cros_ec_dev.c                   | 4 +---
>  drivers/misc/vmw_vmci/vmci_host.c           | 2 +-
>  drivers/nvdimm/bus.c                        | 4 ++--
>  drivers/nvme/host/core.c                    | 6 +++---
>  drivers/pci/switch/switchtec.c              | 2 +-
>  drivers/platform/x86/wmi.c                  | 2 +-
>  drivers/rpmsg/rpmsg_char.c                  | 4 ++--
>  drivers/s390/char/sclp_ctl.c                | 8 ++------
>  drivers/s390/char/vmcp.c                    | 2 ++----
>  drivers/s390/cio/chsc_sch.c                 | 8 ++------
>  drivers/sbus/char/display7seg.c             | 2 +-
>  drivers/sbus/char/envctrl.c                 | 4 +---
>  drivers/scsi/3w-xxxx.c                      | 4 +---
>  drivers/scsi/cxlflash/main.c                | 2 +-
>  drivers/scsi/esas2r/esas2r_main.c           | 2 +-
>  drivers/scsi/pmcraid.c                      | 4 +---
>  drivers/staging/android/ion/ion.c           | 4 +---
>  drivers/staging/vme/devices/vme_user.c      | 2 +-
>  drivers/tee/tee_core.c                      | 2 +-
>  drivers/usb/class/cdc-wdm.c                 | 2 +-
>  drivers/usb/class/usbtmc.c                  | 4 +---
>  drivers/video/fbdev/ps3fb.c                 | 2 +-
>  drivers/video/fbdev/sis/sis_main.c          | 4 +---
>  drivers/virt/fsl_hypervisor.c               | 2 +-
>  fs/btrfs/super.c                            | 2 +-
>  fs/ceph/dir.c                               | 2 +-
>  fs/ceph/file.c                              | 2 +-
>  fs/fuse/dev.c                               | 2 +-
>  fs/notify/fanotify/fanotify_user.c          | 2 +-
>  fs/userfaultfd.c                            | 2 +-
>  net/rfkill/core.c                           | 2 +-
>  41 files changed, 48 insertions(+), 76 deletions(-)
> 
> Out of those, there are only a few that may get used on s390,
> in particular at most infiniband/uverbs, nvme, nvdimm,
> btrfs, ceph, fuse, fanotify and userfaultfd.
> [Note: there are three s390 drivers in the list, which use
> a different method: they check in_compat_syscall() from
> a shared handler to decide whether to do compat_ptr().

Using in_compat_syscall() seems to be a good solution, no?

> According to my memory from when I last worked on this,
> the compat_ptr() is mainly a safeguard for legacy binaries
> that got created with ancient C compilers (or compilers for
> something other than C)  and might leave the high bit set
> in a pointer, but modern C compilers (gcc-3+) won't ever
> do that.

And compat_ptr clears the upper 32-bit of the register. If
the register is loaded to e.g. "lr" or "l" there will be
junk in the 4 upper bytes.

> You are probably right about /dev/random, which could be
> used in lots of weird code, but I wonder to what degree we
> need to worry about it for the rest.

-- 
blue skies,
   Martin.

"Reality continues to ruin my life." - Calvin.