Re: [PATCH] RISC-V: Show CPU ID and Hart ID separately in /proc/cpuinfo

From: Anup Patel
Date: Wed Sep 12 2018 - 23:39:37 EST


On Wed, Sep 12, 2018 at 10:17 PM Atish Patra <atish.patra@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On 9/12/18 7:38 AM, Anup Patel wrote:
> > Currently, /proc/cpuinfo show logical CPU ID as Hart ID which
> > is in-correct. This patch shows CPU ID and Hart ID separately
> > in /proc/cpuinfo using cpuid_to_hardid_map().
> >
> > With this patch, contents of /proc/cpuinfo looks as follows:
> > cpu : 0
> > hart : 1
> > isa : rv64imafdcsu
> > mmu : sv48
> >
> > cpu : 1
> > hart : 0
> > isa : rv64imafdcsu
> > mmu : sv48
> >
> > cpu : 2
> > hart : 3
> > isa : rv64imafdcsu
> > mmu : sv48
> >
> > cpu : 3
> > hart : 2
> > isa : rv64imafdcsu
> > mmu : sv48
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Anup Patel <anup@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > arch/riscv/kernel/cpu.c | 3 ++-
> > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/cpu.c b/arch/riscv/kernel/cpu.c
> > index f0f0ec2737b7..7c1342e242e6 100644
> > --- a/arch/riscv/kernel/cpu.c
> > +++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/cpu.c
> > @@ -87,7 +87,8 @@ static int c_show(struct seq_file *m, void *v)
> > NULL);
> > const char *compat, *isa, *mmu;
> >
> > - seq_printf(m, "hart\t: %lu\n", cpu_id);
> > + seq_printf(m, "cpu\t: %lu\n", cpu_id);
> > + seq_printf(m, "hart\t: %lu\n", cpuid_to_hardid_map(cpu_id));
> > if (!of_property_read_string(node, "riscv,isa", &isa)
> > && isa[0] == 'r'
> > && isa[1] == 'v')
> >
>
> The extra hart information will not be parsed by lscpu which will make
> the cpu information inconsistent between lscpu & /proc/cpuinfo.
>
> Should we patch lscpu as well to show correct hart id as well ?

Yes, we should certainly patch lscpu to parse CPU ID and
HART ID differently.

Regards,
Anup