Re: [PATCH v4 0/6] PCI: imx: Initial imx7d suspend/resume support

[Leonard Crestez]

On Mon, 2018-09-17 at 17:52 +0100, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 17, 2018 at 04:01:21PM +0000, Leonard Crestez wrote:
> > On Mon, 2018-09-17 at 16:09 +0100, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote:
> > > On Tue, Aug 14, 2018 at 07:50:14PM +0300, Leonard Crestez wrote:
> > > > V4 adds 4 more patches with PME_Turn_Off support on top, using a new
> > > > reset bit. I generally try to keep series short but in this case some
> > > > planning might be needed to get patches into 4.20.
> > > > 
> > > > Since the new reset is treated as optional with old DTB there should be
> > > > again no problem if reset and pci are merged out of order.
> > > > 
> > > > Shawn/Philipp/Lorenzo: Would it make sense to merge this series through a
> > > > single specific tree, such as the one for imx?
> > > 
> > > This series is a bit of a mixture of multiple things hard to discern
> > > (actually I already merged patch 2 and patch 1 seems completely
> > > unrelated).
> > > 
> > > I would take the series through the PCI tree but I need an ACK for
> > > patches 5 and 6, please let me know how you want to handle it.
> > 
> > Patches 1 and 2 are already in, the rest need review. I can now just
> > resend patches 3-6 as a separate series, unless somebody complains
> > about spam.
> 
> What do you mean by "are already in" ? Patch 2 I queued via the PCI
> tree, patch 1 ? Can I drop it from the PCI patch queue ?

Sorry, what I meant here is "accepted by a maintainer". So keep patch 2
please; patch 1 was accepted by Shawn few weeks ago.

> I do not think there is any need to resend, I can merge patches 3-4
> since they have been reviewed but patches 5 and 6 need review.

Patches 3-4 were acked by Rob Herring mostly from the devicetree
perspective. Since patches 3-6 are not useful independently somebody
like Lucas should review the whole series and then it can be merged.

--
Regards,
Leonard