Re: [patch V3 02/11] x86/mm/cpa: Split, rename and clean up try_preserve_large_page()
From: Peter Zijlstra
Date: Tue Sep 18 2018 - 04:19:19 EST
On Mon, Sep 17, 2018 at 04:29:08PM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> @@ -1288,23 +1287,23 @@ static int __change_page_attr(struct cpa
> err = split_large_page(cpa, kpte, address);
> if (!err) {
> /*
> + * Do a global flush tlb after splitting the large page
> + * and before we do the actual change page attribute in the PTE.
> + *
> + * With out this, we violate the TLB application note, that says
> + * "The TLBs may contain both ordinary and large-page
> * translations for a 4-KByte range of linear addresses. This
> * may occur if software modifies the paging structures so that
> * the page size used for the address range changes. If the two
> * translations differ with respect to page frame or attributes
> * (e.g., permissions), processor behavior is undefined and may
> * be implementation-specific."
> + *
> + * We do this global tlb flush inside the cpa_lock, so that we
> * don't allow any other cpu, with stale tlb entries change the
> * page attribute in parallel, that also falls into the
> * just split large page entry.
> + */
> flush_tlb_all();
> goto repeat;
> }
this made me look at the tlb invalidation of that thing again; do we
want something like the below?
---
--- a/arch/x86/mm/pageattr.c
+++ b/arch/x86/mm/pageattr.c
@@ -285,16 +285,6 @@ static void cpa_flush_all(unsigned long
on_each_cpu(__cpa_flush_all, (void *) cache, 1);
}
-static void __cpa_flush_range(void *arg)
-{
- /*
- * We could optimize that further and do individual per page
- * tlb invalidates for a low number of pages. Caveat: we must
- * flush the high aliases on 64bit as well.
- */
- __flush_tlb_all();
-}
-
static void cpa_flush_range(unsigned long start, int numpages, int cache)
{
unsigned int i, level;
@@ -303,7 +293,7 @@ static void cpa_flush_range(unsigned lon
BUG_ON(irqs_disabled() && !early_boot_irqs_disabled);
WARN_ON(PAGE_ALIGN(start) != start);
- on_each_cpu(__cpa_flush_range, NULL, 1);
+ flush_tlb_all();
if (!cache)
return;
@@ -1006,14 +996,24 @@ __split_large_page(struct cpa_data *cpa,
__set_pmd_pte(kpte, address, mk_pte(base, __pgprot(_KERNPG_TABLE)));
/*
- * Intel Atom errata AAH41 workaround.
+ * Do a global flush tlb after splitting the large page
+ * and before we do the actual change page attribute in the PTE.
*
- * The real fix should be in hw or in a microcode update, but
- * we also probabilistically try to reduce the window of having
- * a large TLB mixed with 4K TLBs while instruction fetches are
- * going on.
+ * Without this, we violate the TLB application note, that says
+ * "The TLBs may contain both ordinary and large-page
+ * translations for a 4-KByte range of linear addresses. This
+ * may occur if software modifies the paging structures so that
+ * the page size used for the address range changes. If the two
+ * translations differ with respect to page frame or attributes
+ * (e.g., permissions), processor behavior is undefined and may
+ * be implementation-specific."
+ *
+ * We do this global tlb flush inside the cpa_lock, so that we
+ * don't allow any other cpu, with stale tlb entries change the
+ * page attribute in parallel, that also falls into the
+ * just split large page entry.
*/
- __flush_tlb_all();
+ flush_tlb_all();
spin_unlock(&pgd_lock);
return 0;
@@ -1538,28 +1538,8 @@ static int __change_page_attr(struct cpa
* We have to split the large page:
*/
err = split_large_page(cpa, kpte, address);
- if (!err) {
- /*
- * Do a global flush tlb after splitting the large page
- * and before we do the actual change page attribute in the PTE.
- *
- * With out this, we violate the TLB application note, that says
- * "The TLBs may contain both ordinary and large-page
- * translations for a 4-KByte range of linear addresses. This
- * may occur if software modifies the paging structures so that
- * the page size used for the address range changes. If the two
- * translations differ with respect to page frame or attributes
- * (e.g., permissions), processor behavior is undefined and may
- * be implementation-specific."
- *
- * We do this global tlb flush inside the cpa_lock, so that we
- * don't allow any other cpu, with stale tlb entries change the
- * page attribute in parallel, that also falls into the
- * just split large page entry.
- */
- flush_tlb_all();
+ if (!err)
goto repeat;
- }
return err;
}