Re: [PATCH v3 19/20] tpm1: reimplement SAVESTATE using tpm_buf

From: Jarkko Sakkinen
Date: Wed Sep 19 2018 - 11:23:09 EST

Next message: Geert Uytterhoeven: "Re: [PATCH/RFC v4 1/2] reset: Add support for dedicated reset controls"
Previous message: Jarkko Sakkinen: "Re: [PATCH v3 18/20] tpm: use u32 instead of int for pcr index"
In reply to: Tomas Winkler: "[PATCH v3 19/20] tpm1: reimplement SAVESTATE using tpm_buf"
Next in thread: Tomas Winkler: "[PATCH v3 20/20] tpm1: reimplement tpm1_continue_selftest() using tpm_buf"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Tue, Sep 18, 2018 at 12:34:58PM +0300, Tomas Winkler wrote:
> In tpm1_pm_suspend() function reimplement,
> TPM_ORD_SAVESTATE comamnd using tpm_buf.
>
> Signed-off-by: Tomas Winkler <tomas.winkler@xxxxxxxxx>

Reviewed-by: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Tested-by: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

/Jarkko

Next message: Geert Uytterhoeven: "Re: [PATCH/RFC v4 1/2] reset: Add support for dedicated reset controls"
Previous message: Jarkko Sakkinen: "Re: [PATCH v3 18/20] tpm: use u32 instead of int for pcr index"
In reply to: Tomas Winkler: "[PATCH v3 19/20] tpm1: reimplement SAVESTATE using tpm_buf"
Next in thread: Tomas Winkler: "[PATCH v3 20/20] tpm1: reimplement tpm1_continue_selftest() using tpm_buf"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]