Re: [PATCH 6/6] fsconfig: rename FSCONFIG_CMD_CREATE to FSCONFIG_CMD_OBTAIN

[David Howells]

Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> The old name strongly implies that a new superblock will be created from
> the fs_context.  This is not true: filesystems are free to retuse an
> existing superblock and return that (for good reason).

Kind of like open(O_CREAT) only ever creates files, right;-)

Actually, FSCONFIG_CMD_OPEN might be a better name.

David