Re: [PATCH 3/3] fuse: Use hash table to link processing request

From: Miklos Szeredi
Date: Tue Sep 25 2018 - 05:08:58 EST


On Tue, Sep 11, 2018 at 12:12 PM, Kirill Tkhai <ktkhai@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> We noticed the performance bottle neck in FUSE running our
> Virtuozzo storage over rdma. On some types of workload
> we observe 20% of times pent in request_find() in profiler.
> This function is iterating over long requests list, and it
> scales bad.
>
> The patch introduces hash table to reduce the number
> of iterations, we do in this function. Hash generating
> algorithm is taken from hash_add() function, while
> 512 lines table is used to store pending requests.
> This fixes problem and improves the performance.

Pushed to fuse.git#for-next with a number of small changes. E.g. I
reduced the number of cachlines to 256 to make the hashtable size just
4k. Was there a scientific reason for choosing 512 as the optimal
number of cache lines?

Thanks,
Miklos