Re: [PATCH v4 2/6] dt-bindings: power: Add qcom rpm power domain driver bindings

[Rajendra Nayak]

Hi Rob,

[]...
> > > > > +   rpmhpd_opp_table: opp-table {
> > > > > +           compatible = "operating-points-v2-qcom-level";
> > > > > +
> > > > > +           rpmhpd_opp_ret: opp1 {
> > > > > +                   qcom,level = <RPMH_REGULATOR_LEVEL_RETENTION>;
> > > > > +           };
> > > >
> > > > I don't see the point in using the OPP binding here when you aren't
> > > > using *any* of the properties from it.
> > >
> > > Yeah, that's the case for now. But there are cases (as Stephen
> > > mentioned earlier [1]) where the voltage values (and maybe other
> > > values like current, etc) would be known and filled in DT. And that's
> > > why we all agreed to use OPP tables for PM domains as well, as these
> > > are really "operating performance points" of these PM domains.
> >
> > Rob, are you fine with these bindings then?
>
> Okay, my only thought is whether we should just use 'reg' here, or do
> we need 'level' for anything else and should make it common?

I am not quite sure I understood what you are suggesting here :(