Re: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH] f2fs: fix quota info to adjust recovered data

From: Chao Yu
Date: Tue Sep 25 2018 - 22:06:54 EST

Next message: Jaegeuk Kim: "Re: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH] f2fs: fix quota info to adjust recovered data"
Previous message: Chao Yu: "Re: [PATCH v3] f2fs: submit cached bio to avoid endless PageWriteback"
In reply to: Jaegeuk Kim: "Re: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH] f2fs: fix quota info to adjust recovered data"
Next in thread: Jaegeuk Kim: "Re: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH] f2fs: fix quota info to adjust recovered data"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On 2018/9/26 9:44, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
> On 09/26, Chao Yu wrote:
>> On 2018/9/26 8:29, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
>>> On 09/21, Chao Yu wrote:
>>>> On 2018/9/21 5:42, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
>>>>> On 09/20, Chao Yu wrote:
>>>>>> On 2018/9/20 6:38, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
>>>>>>> On 09/19, Chao Yu wrote:
>>>>>>>> On 2018/9/19 0:45, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On 09/18, Chao Yu wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> On 2018/9/18 10:05, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> On 09/18, Chao Yu wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2018/9/18 9:19, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 09/13, Chao Yu wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2018/9/13 3:54, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 09/12, Chao Yu wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2018/9/12 9:40, Chao Yu wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2018/9/12 9:25, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 09/12, Chao Yu wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2018/9/12 8:27, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 09/11, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 09/12, Chao Yu wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2018/9/12 4:15, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> fsck.f2fs is able to recover the quota structure, since roll-forward recovery
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> can recover it based on previous user information.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I didn't get it, both fsck and kernel recover quota file based all inodes'
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> uid/gid/prjid, if {x}id didn't change, wouldn't those two recovery result be the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> same?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I thought that, but had to add this, since I was encountering quota errors right
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> after getting some files recovered. And, I thought it'd make it more safe to do
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> fsck after roll-forward recovery.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Anyway, let me test again without this patch for a while.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hmm, I just got a fsck failure right after some files recovered.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> To make sure, do you test with "f2fs: guarantee journalled quota data by
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> checkpoint"? if not, I think there is no guarantee that f2fs can recover
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> quote info into correct quote file, because, in last checkpoint, quota file
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> may was corrupted/inconsistent. Right?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Oh, I forget to mention that, I add a patch to fsck to let it noticing
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> CP_QUOTA_NEED_FSCK_FLAG flag, and by default, fsck will fix corrupted quote
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> file if the flag is set, but w/o this flag, quota file is still corrupted
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> detected by fsck, I guess there is bug in v8.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In v8, there are two cases we didn't guarantee quota file's consistence:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1. flush time in block_operation exceed a threshold.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2. dquot subsystem error occurs.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> For above case, fsck should repair the quota file by default.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Okay, I got another failure and it seems CP_QUOTA_NEED_FSCK_FLAG was not set
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> during the recovery. So, we have something missing in the recovery in terms
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of quota updates.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Yeah, I checked the code, just found one suspected place:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> find_fsync_dnodes()
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - f2fs_recover_inode_page
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - inc_valid_node_count
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - dquot_reserve_block dquot info is not initialized now
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - add_fsync_inode
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - dquot_initialize
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I think we should reserve block for inode block after dquot_initialize(), can
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you confirm this?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Let me test this.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> >From b90260bc577fe87570b1ef7b134554a8295b1f6c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
>>>>>>>>>>>>> From: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@xxxxxxxxxx>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2018 18:14:41 -0700
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Subject: [PATCH] f2fs: count inode block for recovered files
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> If a new file is recovered, we missed to reserve its inode block.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> I remember, in order to keep line with other filesystem, unlike on-disk, we
>>>>>>>>>>>> have to keep backward compatibilty, in memory we don't account block number
>>>>>>>>>>>> for f2fs' inode block, but only account inode number for it, so here like
>>>>>>>>>>>> we did in inc_valid_node_count(), we don't need to do this.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Okay, I just hit the error again w/o your patch. Another one coming to my mind
>>>>>>>>>>> is that caused by uid/gid change during recovery. Let me try out your patch.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> I guess we should update dquot and inode's uid/gid atomically under
>>>>>>>>>> lock_op() in f2fs_setattr() to prevent corruption on sys quota file.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> v9 can pass all xfstest cases and por_fsstress case w/ sys quota file
>>>>>>>>>> enabled, but w/ normal quota file, I got one regression reported by
>>>>>>>>>> generic/232, I fixed in v10, will do some tests and release it later.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Note that, my fsck can fix corrupted quota file automatically once
>>>>>>>>>> CP_QUOTA_NEED_FSCK_FLAG is set.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I hit failures again with your v9 w/ sysfile quota and modified fsck to detect
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> That's strange, in my environment, before v9, I always encounter corrupted
>>>>>>>> quota sysfile after step 9), after v9, I never hit failure again.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> 1) enable fault injection
>>>>>>>> 2) run fsstress
>>>>>>>> 3) call shutdowon
>>>>>>>> 4) kill fsstress
>>>>>>>> 5) unmount
>>>>>>>> 6) fsck
>>>>>>>> 7) mount
>>>>>>>> 8) umount
>>>>>>>> 9) fsck
>>>>>>>> 10) go 1).
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> CP_QUOTA_NEED_FSCK_FLAG to fix the partition. Note that, if I set NEED_FSCK
>>>>>>>>> flag in roll-forward recovery, everything is fine.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I do the test based on codes in my git tree, could you check the result
>>>>>>>> again based on my code? in where I just disable nat_bits recovery, not
>>>>>>>> sure, in step 6) fsck can break some thing in image.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/chao/linux.git/log/?h=f2fs-dev
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Also, I just send the fsck code, could you check that too?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> And I'd like to know your mount option and mkfs option, could you list for me?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I'm just doing this.
>>>>>>> https://github.com/jaegeuk/xfstests-f2fs/blob/f2fs/run.sh#L220
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I just sent one patch to fix POR issue which missed to recover uid/gid of
>>>>>> inode.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> [PATCH] f2fs: fix to recover inode's uid/gid during POR
>>>>>>
>>>>>> After applying this patch, I can reproduce sys quota file corruption... let
>>>>>> me figure out the solution.
>>>>>
>>>>> Okay.
>>>>
>>>> Could you try v11, no quota corruption in my test now.
>>>
>>> Chao,
>>>
>>> I missed your fsck patch to recover this. Could you post it as well?
>>
>> Could you check below one?
>>
>> https://lore.kernel.org/patchwork/patch/988210/
>
> It'd be worth to show the flag in print_cp_state.

That patch has already added that?

diff --git a/fsck/mount.c b/fsck/mount.c
index 6a3382dbd449..21a39a7222c6 100644
--- a/fsck/mount.c
+++ b/fsck/mount.c
@@ -405,6 +405,8 @@ void print_ckpt_info(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi)
void print_cp_state(u32 flag)
{
MSG(0, "Info: checkpoint state = %x : ", flag);
+ if (flag & CP_QUOTA_NEED_FSCK_FLAG)
+ MSG(0, "%s", " quota_need_fsck");

Thanks,

>
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>>
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Can you test v9 first? I didn't encounter quota corruption with your
>>>>>>>>>>>> testcase right now. Will check it in cell phone environment.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Chao Yu <yuchao0@xxxxxxxxxx>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@xxxxxxxxxx>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> ---
>>>>>>>>>>>>> fs/f2fs/recovery.c | 5 +++++
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/recovery.c b/fs/f2fs/recovery.c
>>>>>>>>>>>>> index 56d34193a74b..bff5cf730e13 100644
>>>>>>>>>>>>> --- a/fs/f2fs/recovery.c
>>>>>>>>>>>>> +++ b/fs/f2fs/recovery.c
>>>>>>>>>>>>> @@ -84,6 +84,11 @@ static struct fsync_inode_entry *add_fsync_inode(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi,
>>>>>>>>>>>>> err = dquot_alloc_inode(inode);
>>>>>>>>>>>>> if (err)
>>>>>>>>>>>>> goto err_out;
>>>>>>>>>>>>> + err = dquot_reserve_block(inode, 1);
>>>>>>>>>>>>> + if (err) {
>>>>>>>>>>>>> + dquot_drop(inode);
>>>>>>>>>>>>> + goto err_out;
>>>>>>>>>>>>> + }
>>>>>>>>>>>>> }
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> entry = f2fs_kmem_cache_alloc(fsync_entry_slab, GFP_F2FS_ZERO);
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> .
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> .
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> .
>>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> .
>>>>>
>>>
>>> .
>>>
>
> .
>

Next message: Jaegeuk Kim: "Re: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH] f2fs: fix quota info to adjust recovered data"
Previous message: Chao Yu: "Re: [PATCH v3] f2fs: submit cached bio to avoid endless PageWriteback"
In reply to: Jaegeuk Kim: "Re: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH] f2fs: fix quota info to adjust recovered data"
Next in thread: Jaegeuk Kim: "Re: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH] f2fs: fix quota info to adjust recovered data"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]